Re: NZ: Banks Demand a Look Inside Customer PCs in Fraud Case s

["Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Dennis Henderson" <hendomatic () gmail com> wrote:

> When will the customer have to have at least some responsibility for
> their action/inactions?

Well, this is kind of complicated, and I personally believe it is
the wrong question.

All to often, consumers are completely unwitting victims, through
no fault of their own.

I'd like to understand how any additional "responsibility" by
a user, who is not doing anything "risky", solves anything.

Basic security shouldn't require a consumer to be a rocket
scientist.

> I guess the person who invents the perfectly secure internet
> transaction will be the richest person on the planet. Imagine being
> able to conduct a secure pc based internet transaction with every kind
> of trojan and keylogger installed....

This is one of my major complaints with people thinking that
"Internet security" means encrypting or securing the end-to-end
transaction -- once the consumer PC is compromised, all bets are off.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)

wj8DBQFGgwIZq1pz9mNUZTMRAsDTAJ4x11gnSoTrcIiLCGfHP8ljbCUObACg3uzQ
8jUhEem9udnJ3uB6PpQOnFg=
=IKR2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.