funsec mailing list archives

Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case


From: eliza <ghooti () googlemail com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:54:12 -0800

idiot.

the point is not that i can 'dig' them up - i dont care what you and
your 'justice' system do. i didnt 'dig' up shit.

http://www.google.com/search?q=ConnYankee1951

[bottom link for the stupid - ie, you]

my point (which you seem you miss entirely) is that how on earth can
you expect anyone that posts their real name and address on the
internet (good move there), then attempt to hide behind an alias -
without even googling their own 'secret' name themselves to make a
judgment on anyone - let alone an informed one - this seems to be show
by thier comments.

check out the spelling mistakes too.

glad i dont live in your country.

p433r t3h g00g13 f00

tit.

(btw petty would be to actually dig up some info and post it to
full-disclosure)  - and for all we know it might have been
connyankee1951 () gmail com....

On 2/15/07, Randy Abrams <abrams () eset com> wrote:
It not worth anything. It's petty and stupid... Big deal you can find
the juror. The juror doesn't make the sentence.

The juror can hardly be blamed for an incompetent judge, an even more
incompetent cop, and a DA who refuses to uphold his oath to pursue
justice.

Due to an either corrupt or mid-bogglingly ignorant combination of
Judge, Cop (Lounsbury), DA, and even defense attorney the jury had to
decide with fabricated information.

It's just petty to dig up and post the guy's details here.

You degrade yourself.

Randy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org
> [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of eliza
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:09 PM
> To: dan () losangelescomputerhelp com; rms () computerbytesman com
> Cc: funsec () linuxbox org
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case
>
> for what it is worth....
>
> http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/f/o/x/Fred-S-Fox/index.html
>
> On 2/15/07, Daniel H. Renner <dan () losangelescomputerhelp com> wrote:
> > People ranting insanely will accuse others of what they themselves
> > have done.  Proof?
> >
> > Who originated the SBA?
> >
> > And how many times has that company been in the courts for
> piracy? 35 or so?
> >
> > And the RIAA?  How many people have they infected from their little
> > P2P servers while they scream "pirates!"?  (Not that I believe in
> > pirating...)
> >
> > A quiet township that attacks others in a malicious manner is a
> > township afraid their own faults will be found out.
> >
> > And yes, 40 years for that "crime" is nothing short of
> malicious and evil.
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Daniel H. Renner
> > President
> > Los Angeles Computerhelp
> > A division of Computerhelp, Inc.
> > 818-352-8700
> > http://losangelescomputerhelp.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: