funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] No Child Left Behind ‘Privacy’ Policy Under Attack
From: "Dennis Henderson" <hendomatic () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:29:23 -0500
In the interest of full disclosure, here is the section concerning the reporting of student information to military recruiters. Its pretty grey and I couldn't find any mention of sanctions as reported in the article as to the privacy of the student. SEC. 9528. ARMED FORCES RECRUITER ACCESS TO STUDENTS AND STUDENT RECRUITING INFORMATION. (a) POLICY- (1) ACCESS TO STUDENT RECRUITING INFORMATION- Notwithstanding section 444(a)(5)(B) of the General Education Provisions Act and except as provided in paragraph (2), each local educational agency receiving assistance under this Act shall provide, on a request made by military recruiters or an institution of higher education, access to secondary school students names, addresses, and telephone listings. (2) CONSENT- A secondary school student or the parent of the student may request that the student's name, address, and telephone listing described in paragraph (1) not be released without prior written parental consent, and the local educational agency or private school shall notify parents of the option to make a request and shall comply with any request. (3) SAME ACCESS TO STUDENTS- Each local educational agency receiving assistance under this Act shall provide military recruiters the same access to secondary school students as is provided generally to post secondary educational institutions or to prospective employers of those students. (b) NOTIFICATION- The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, notify principals, school administrators, and other educators about the requirements of this section. (c) EXCEPTION- The requirements of this section do not apply to a private secondary school that maintains a religious objection to service in the Armed Forces if the objection is verifiable through the corporate or other organizational documents or materials of that school. (d) SPECIAL RULE- A local educational agency prohibited by Connecticut State law (either explicitly by statute or through statutory interpretation by the State Supreme Court or State Attorney General) from providing military recruiters with information or access as required by this section shall have until May 31, 2002, to comply with that requirement. Provisions like this have existed in education bill since the 60's.. nothing new... On 10/27/06, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
Via the Lawrence (Kansas) Journal-World. [snip] Buried in the 670 pages of the federal No Child Left Behind law was a requirement that high schools provide lists of students' names, telephone numbers and addresses to military recruiters. Students can get off the list if they or their parents notify the school district in writing that they want to opt out. But there's a catch. Those who opt off the list find themselves also excluded from the lists provided to college and job recruiters. And opting out also means a student's name cannot be published in yearbooks, honor rolls or newspapers. [snip] More: http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/oct/26/privacy_policy_under_attack/ - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
_______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- No Child Left Behind ‘Privacy’ Policy Under Attack Fergie (Oct 27)
- Re: [privacy] No Child Left Behind ‘Privacy’ Policy Under Attack Dude VanWinkle (Oct 27)
- Re: [privacy] No Child Left Behind ‘Privacy’ Policy Under Attack Drsolly (Oct 28)
- Re: [privacy] No Child Left Behind ‘Privacy’ Policy Under Attack Dennis Henderson (Oct 28)
- Re: [privacy] No Child Left Behind ‘Privacy’ Policy Under Attack Dude VanWinkle (Oct 27)