funsec mailing list archives
RE: *groan*
From: "Krpata, Tyler" <tkrpata () bjs com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:55:00 -0400
Nor do they support octets in IPv4 addresses that are greater than 8 bits... -----Original Message----- From: Blue Boar [mailto:BlueBoar () thievco com] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:35 PM To: rMslade () shaw ca Cc: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] *groan* Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah wrote:
OK, I'm thinking it's a subnet mask, and the significance of 255 is
easy to figure.
240 and 252 less so, but at least they are within range. But 257?
I have encountered many people who don't believe in non-contiguous subnet masks. To be fair, a number of OSes don't support them anymore. BB _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- *groan* Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Jeff Kell (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Blue Boar (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* der Mouse (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- Re: *groan* Blue Boar (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Nick FitzGerald (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- Re: *groan* Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Oct 27)
- Re: *groan* Dude VanWinkle (Oct 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: *groan* Krpata, Tyler (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Blue Boar (Oct 26)
- RE: *groan* Drsolly (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Dude VanWinkle (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Fergie (Oct 26)