funsec mailing list archives
[privacy] At U.S. Borders, Laptops Have No Right to Privacy
From: <rms () bsf-llc com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:10:35 -0400
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/24/business/24road.html?ref=technology <http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/24/business/24road.html?ref=technology&pagew anted=print> &pagewanted=print October 24, 2006 On the Road At U.S. Borders, Laptops Have No Right to Privacy By <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/joe_sharkey/in dex.html?inline=nyt-per> JOE SHARKEY A LOT of business travelers are walking around with laptops that contain private corporate information that their employers really do not want outsiders to see. Until recently, their biggest concern was that someone might steal the laptop. But now there's a new worry - that the laptop will be seized or its contents scrutinized at United States customs and <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/i/immigration_ and_refugees/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> immigration checkpoints upon entering the United States from abroad. Although much of the evidence for the confiscations remains anecdotal, it's a hot topic this week among more than 1,000 corporate travel managers and travel industry officials meeting in Barcelona at a conference of the Association of Corporate Travel Executives. Last week, an informal survey by the association, which has about 2,500 members worldwide, indicated that almost 90 percent of its members were not aware that customs officials have the authority to scrutinize the contents of travelers' laptops and even confiscate laptops for a period of time, without giving a reason. "One member who responded to our survey said she has been waiting for a year to get her laptop and its contents back," said Susan Gurley, the group's executive director. "She said it was randomly seized. And since she hasn't been arrested, I assume she was just a regular business traveler, not a criminal." Appeals are under way in some cases, but the law is clear. "They don't need probable cause to perform these searches under the current law. They can do it without suspicion or without really revealing their motivations," said Tim Kane, a Washington lawyer who is researching the matter for corporate clients. In some cases, random inspections of laptops have yielded evidence of possession of child pornography. Laptops may be scrutinized and subject to a "forensic analysis" under the so-called border search exemption, which allows searches of people entering the United States and their possessions "without probable cause, reasonable suspicion or a warrant," a federal court ruled in July. In that case, a man's laptop was found to have child pornography images on its hard drive. No one is defending criminal possession of child pornography or even suggesting that the government has "nefarious" intent in conducting random searches of a traveler's laptop, Ms. Gurley said. "But it appears from information we have that agents have a lot of discretion in doing these searches, and that there's a whole spectrum of reasons for doing them," she added. ...
_______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] At U.S. Borders, Laptops Have No Right to Privacy rms (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] At U.S. Borders, Laptops Have No Right to Privacy Dude VanWinkle (Oct 25)