funsec mailing list archives
Re: No Tag anymore !?!
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:08:47 +1300
der Mouse wrote:
No. Why would you want to eliminate the genes for them? As I said, those aren't the reproductive handicap they once were; how did you leap from that to wanting to make them so once again?
Indeed, at least some of those genes may be linked with other "now desirable" (though not necessarily "environmentally advantageous" in true Darwinian sense) genes... Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: No Tag anymore !?!, (continued)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Nick FitzGerald (Oct 19)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! der Mouse (Oct 19)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Drsolly (Oct 20)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Ron (Oct 20)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Drsolly (Oct 20)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Ron (Oct 20)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Drsolly (Oct 20)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! der Mouse (Oct 20)
- Re: No Tag anymore !?! Nick FitzGerald (Oct 20)
- RE: No Tag anymore !?! Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Oct 18)