Re: Heads Up: U.S. Businesses Forced to Change the Way They S ave Data on D ec. 1

["Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:

> On 11/28/06, Steve Kalman <techauthor () gmail com> wrote:
> <snip>
> > While the SC rules don't require any changes in the way data is
> > handled or stored, the expense of litigation compared to the expense
> > of recovery (and traditional risk analysis) will lead to the changes
> > envisioned.
> <snip>
>
>
> Easy enough to avoid, right, provide no retention of your data -
> backups or otherwise. Then its not a matter of expense but
> possibility, "sorry, we don't retain copies of our e-mail, nor do we
> back it up." Right?

Well, some U.S. congresscritters are trying to introduce
legislation to force that issue as well. This is the last
news I saw on the topic:

 http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6118283.html

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.1 (Build 1557)

wj8DBQFFbIa7q1pz9mNUZTMRAt7DAJ9ZibkH4eF6tOv6isTPdqXCvh8rYgCfVGeb
s5KdpieXycSbExB6Azi57zg=
=HaEQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.