Re: time for the release of another ie 0-day

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

agreed.

On 10/10/06, Blanchard_Michael () emc com <Blanchard_Michael () emc com> wrote:
>  made public should suffice in this case.
>
>
> Michael P. Blanchard
> Antivirus / Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, CCSA-NGX, MCSE
> Office of Information Security & Risk Management
> EMC ² Corporation
> 4400 Computer Dr.
> Westboro, MA 01580
> -----Original Message-----
> From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 4:44 PM
> To: Dude VanWinkle
> Cc: FunSec [List]
> Subject: Re: [funsec] time for the release of another ie 0-day
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:24:33 EDT, Dude VanWinkle said:
> > anyone taking bets on whether we will see another 0-day for ie
> > discovered in the next two days?
>
> discovered, or released to the world?
>
> Big significant difference there.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.