funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds
From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:29:15 -0500
On 9/21/06, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
Checks and balances?
Exactly, they're asking the court to reign in a lower court. The appeals court may or may not do it. I don't understand your point.
The executive branch trying muscle the judicial branch?
They'll do what they want (and hopefully what is right). Perhaps I'm too cynical but I'm pretty sure that if you believed this information could be bad if released (or there was a different president in office defending it) you wouldn't want the government to be brought to its knees by some piss-and court...would you? _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds Fergie (Sep 21)
- Re: [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds Brian Loe (Sep 21)
- Re: [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds Dave Dittrich (Sep 21)
- Re: [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds Brian Loe (Sep 21)
- Re: [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds Dave Dittrich (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds Gregory Hicks (Sep 21)
- Re: [privacy] Wiretap Case: 'Drop It,' Say Feds Brian Loe (Sep 21)