funsec mailing list archives

Re: U.S. Finance Sector Weighs In on Net Neutrality


From: Greg Poirier <grep () reflexsecurity com>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 16:05:34 -0400

On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:47 -0400, Dude VanWinkle wrote:
So the internet is really made up of:

360networks
AboveNet
<snip>
Xspedius

Yes.

So comcast sells client access to the pipe they lease from Quest. This
connection would not be messed with, however if Google has a pipe on
Telstra, they may rate limit packets from Quest to Google in order to
force google to pay more bucks.

Is that right? does it matter if google leases a pipe from Quest
rather than Telstra?

No, because the point at which they're rate-limiting is before the
packets ever hit Qwest.  The rate-limiting would occur within Comcast's
network since Comcast owns everything from their border routers to the
client they're selling Internet connectivity to.

What to stop ISPx from not rate limiting at all and getting the big
content providers (google) to switch to their networks, as well as the
big end user bandwidth resellers (comcast)?

What you're starting to describe is the best case scenario.

ISP X tells Google to pony up the dough, Google refuses and stops
peering/buying bandwidth from ISP X.

ISP Y offers Google a sweet deal, so Google switches over there and
enjoys unfettered access to ISP Y's subscribers.

ISP X's subscribers cancel their memberships for ISP Y because they
can't live without Google.

Unfortunately at the level we're talking, ISP X and ISP Y are probably
so well interconnected that it will cost Google more to shift things
around, possibly running them into the ground in the process, than to
pony up the dough.

Will wireless technologies save us from the ISP's and this is just
their death throes (remember the price of Kodak film just before the
digital camera?)?

Wireless providers stand to make money off of this as well.  It's in
their best interest to charge Google money too.

-- 
Greg Poirier    | Reflex Security, Inc.
Sigma Team      | Network Security.  Simplified.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Current thread: