funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 23:47:30 -0400
On 5/18/06, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
"liberal" has changed meaning more times than you've changed your shorts. Its also a label - not a name - which I realize might be too subtle of a difference for some but you seemed to understand when you went on to On 5/18/06, Randy Abrams <abrams () eset com> wrote:"Are all liberals..." No offense, but this colors your posts ignorant. You obviously do not know the definition of liberal, or choose to ignore it using the word "liberal""liberal" has changed meaning more times than you've changed your shortsas a dishonest innuendo and in return as a type of name calling, but not atI'd call it a label - not a namethe individual you have a beef with, but at a broad group of people. I know that groups as large as "liberals", "independents", and "conservatives" never walk lock step and have a plethora of views within them, so I won't assume that all ultra-right wing conservatives share your inconsiderable conversational skills.Ahh.. so you know what a label is then... I would like to see where I represented myself as an "ultra-right wing conservative" though - pretty sure I've stated exactly where I am in the political spectrum. Maybe you have difficulties following conversations over more than one thread...Clearly you were completely and totally unable to come up with a substantive argument, so you proved Dude's point instead with a troll about "all liberals".No, I didn't have an argument to his name calling (and he was calling someone else names)... try to keep up.
Its an understandable mistake. You and "StyleWar" are almost indistinguishable from each other. A very good technical conversation can be turned into a boring session of "teach the fool about reality" due to overreaction from a small joke in a posters comments. -JP<the fool's tool> _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of 'Ordinary'Americans, (continued)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of 'Ordinary'Americans Dude VanWinkle (May 17)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of 'Ordinary'Americans Brian Loe (May 17)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of 'Ordinary'Americans Dude VanWinkle (May 17)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of 'Ordinary'Americans Brian Loe (May 18)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of 'Ordinary'Americans Dude VanWinkle (May 18)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of 'Ordinary'Americans Dude VanWinkle (May 17)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Randy Abrams (May 18)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Brian Loe (May 18)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Randy Abrams (May 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Brian Loe (May 18)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Dude VanWinkle (May 19)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Blanchard_Michael (May 17)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Valdis . Kletnieks (May 17)
- Re: [privacy] Bush: U.S. Doesn't Eavesdrop on Phone Calls of'Ordinary'Americans Brian Loe (May 18)