funsec mailing list archives
Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up?
From: "Jerry Hill" <malaclypse2 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:30:21 -0400
On 5/15/06, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
Ahhh, revisionist history. Gotta love it. ;-) Here are just a few references for you:
[snip links to McCarthy info] So, when faced faced with a choice of an easy legal way to obtain the information you want and a difficult illegal way to obtain the exact same information, you think that most people will opt for the difficult, illegal way? The way that also has a chance of tying up your case for extra years of legal wrangling, and giving you a political black eye? If this information wasn't available any other way, I wouldn't hesitate to go along with the idea that it was obtained illicitly. In the current situation as we know it though, I just don't buy it. -- Jerry _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Brian Loe (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? StyleWar (May 15)