funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 18:44:46 GMT
Is it too much to ask? Absolutely not, in my opinion. In fact, I fully expct it is everyone's right to be secure and unmolested in your personal communications until such a time that _reasonable_cause_ can be shown to a court that you have commited some sort of crime. :-) Any any event, great reference! :-) - ferg p.s. For anyone wondering, Grapthar's Hammer: http://imdb.com/title/tt0177789/ -- Greg Poirier <grep () reflexsecurity com> wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 18:13 +0000, Fergie wrote:
I suppose you're right, given that I'm not a Skype user, nor a VoIP user in any way, shape, or form. :-) But I'll bet this will: http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpfone/
I hadn't seen this. Excellent.
Of course, it won't help with traffic analysis, but that's where something like a Tor system would come in handy. :-)
By Grapthar's Hammer, I don't care about traffic analysis. I just want secure untraceable communication. Is that so much to ask?!?!?!?! (more punctuation means more emphasis) grep -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Fergie (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Greg Poirier (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Dude VanWinkle (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block daniel uriah clemens (May 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Fergie (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Greg Poirier (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Fergie (May 05)