funsec mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft knew about the WMF flaw for years
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:20:45 -0500
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:03:07 EST, "Richard M. Smith" said:
1. Given the obvious dangers with SetAbortProc records, why didn't Microsoft simply disable the feature in the Windows operating system altogether and come up alternate for aborting printing of WMF files? Why were all the inadequate work-arounds in application code pursued instead?
You're new here, aren't you? :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Microsoft knew about the WMF flaw for years Richard M. Smith (Jan 16)
- RE: Microsoft knew about the WMF flaw for years Larry Seltzer (Jan 16)
- RE: Microsoft knew about the WMF flaw for years Thomas Mannfred Carlsson (Jan 16)
- Re: Microsoft knew about the WMF flaw for years Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- RE: Microsoft knew about the WMF flaw for years Larry Seltzer (Jan 16)