funsec mailing list archives
RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:16:47 -0500
"...Bruce Lehman, Patent Office commissioner through much of the 1990s, once summed up the problem when he said, "We are the patent >> office, not the rejection office."
Wow -- excellent news.
Yeah, it's a hell of a quote.
could someone who is tell me if these plans will allow
"review-before-suit" for patents already granted under the old processes? Here's Smith's proposed "Patent Reform Act of 2005": http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.2795: Here's the press release for it: http://lamarsmith.house.gov/news.asp?FormMode=Detail&ID=648 Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larryseltzer () ziffdavis com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent, (continued)
- Re: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Drsolly (Mar 30)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Drsolly (Mar 30)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Nick FitzGerald (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Richard M. Smith (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Nick FitzGerald (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Richard M. Smith (Mar 29)
- Re: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 30)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Larry Seltzer (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Nick FitzGerald (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Larry Seltzer (Mar 29)