funsec mailing list archives
Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:30:48 +0000 (GMT)
the only evidence at hand not explained by this theory is the success of Perl. perhaps Perl escapes the categories of this system by having borrowed from virtually every pre-existing language.
For me, perl was good because it so resembled Algol/Pascal, and once I got the hand of regexes and hashes, it was lovely.
to think that the world's browsing population could be bothered to download a 5MByte python image but will never be offered the equivilent functionality in the form of a 75KByte USCD P-system image, is so disheartening that it almost HAS to be true.
I looked at getting back to Pascal, but the main issue on that, would be the huge amount of third-party libraries I can use in perl via CPAN. How does the USCD equivalent look? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Florian Weimer (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Paul Vixie (Mar 12)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 12)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Larry Seltzer (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Drsolly (Mar 13)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Paul Vixie (Mar 13)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 14)