funsec mailing list archives
RE: de-perimeterisation
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:09:46 -0500
Energy group BP has shifted thousands of its employees off its LAN in an
attempt to repel organised cyber criminals.
http://software.silicon.com/security/0,39024655,39156608,00.htm
I think this has to be missing some critical information, like how the notebooks access company information. If they're VPNing in, for example, is that really any better than just putting them on the LAN and using NAC to enforce strong client security mechanisms? Actually, forget the VPN stuff; isn't NAC the answer to the concerns expressed in this article? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- de-perimeterisation Randall M (Feb 21)
- RE: de-perimeterisation Larry Seltzer (Feb 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: de-perimeterisation Fergie (Feb 21)
- RE: de-perimeterisation Brian Azzopardi (Feb 21)
- Re: de-perimeterisation Xyberpix (Feb 21)