funsec mailing list archives
RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:17:08 -0500
I think that Google's censorware has a bug! Tiananmen and tiananmen should return the same results according to Google help: http://www.google.com/help/basics.html Capitalization Google searches are NOT case sensitive. All letters, regardless of how you type them, will be understood as lower case. For example, searches for george washington, George Washington, and gEoRgE wAsHiNgToN will all return the same results. Richard PS. Don't anyone tell the Chinese government about this Google issue! ;-) -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of David Ulevitch Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 8:41 PM To: Gadi Evron Cc: FunSec [List] Subject: Re: [funsec] all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example On Jan 29, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
Taken from lgf:
Stop reading that site. You are too smart.
http://images.google.com/images?q=tiananmen http://images.google.cn/images?q=tiananmen
Capitalize the T. Tiananmen is a proper noun. Then compare the results. http://images.google.com/images?q=Tiananmen http://images.google.cn/images?q=Tiananmen Look any better? *sigh* -david
Comapare what Chinese see, and what the rest of the world sees. Gadi. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Gadi Evron (Jan 29)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Tobias Ulmer (Jan 29)
- RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Richard M. Smith (Jan 29)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jan 29)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Drsolly (Jan 30)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jan 30)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Drsolly (Jan 30)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example David Ulevitch (Jan 29)
- RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Richard M. Smith (Jan 29)
- RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Richard M. Smith (Jan 29)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example David Ulevitch (Jan 29)
- RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Richard M. Smith (Jan 29)
- RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Richard M. Smith (Jan 29)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Dude VanWinkle (Jan 29)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Nick FitzGerald (Jan 30)
- Re: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Nick FitzGerald (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Skyler King (Jan 29)
- RE: all the paranoid "privacy dudes" - check this .CN example Todd Towles (Jan 30)