funsec mailing list archives
Re: Mac Security
From: Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:50:39 -0500
On 1/19/06, Todd Towles <toddtowles () brookshires com> wrote:
Linux admins that don't think they can be hacked are just mis-imformed it would appear. I am by no means a Linux expert (I barely see myself as a Linux admin), but I know that if I was going to put a Linux server on the internet, every service that was accessible would be Chrooted, looked at for excessive global write permissions, unneeded services would be disabled, remote root login would be disable, unneeded Apache mods should be removed or disabled, etc, etc. And I am not even sure how to do 100% of those things (very little experience in chroot jails), but then against I don't admin Linux servers...if I had to, I would find out really fast. ;)
Ja, well even the s00per l33t can be nabbed, or has that kismet flaw been fixed yet? ;-) -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Mac Security, (continued)
- Re: Mac Security Dude VanWinkle (Jan 18)
- Re[2]: Mac Security Pierre Vandevenne (Jan 18)
- Re: Re[2]: Mac Security Dude VanWinkle (Jan 18)
- RE: Mac Security David Harley (Jan 19)
- Re: Mac Security Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)
- Re: Mac Security Dude VanWinkle (Jan 18)
- RE: Mac Security Nick FitzGerald (Jan 19)
- Re: Mac Security Dude VanWinkle (Jan 19)
- Re: Mac Security Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)