funsec mailing list archives

RE: The Whitehouse Web site is bugged


From: Dan Renner <dan () losangelescomputerhelp com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:57:42 -0800

Then all the privacy-prone types should be happy for adware/spyware and
the like - seems a lot of our clients think that when this type of
software slows doen their computer (6 months after they bought it) they
need to get a new one.

There goes Webtrends tracking... "Wait!  There are FIFTEEN Mrs.
Olbloskinatuskas!?"  <snicker>
-- 


Sincerely,

Dan Renner
President
Los Angeles Computerhelp
Phone:   818-352-8700
Website: http://losangelescomputerhelp.com
Blog:    http://itdiaries.com



On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:25 -0600, funsec-request () linuxbox org wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:24:07 -0500
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Subject: RE: [funsec] The Whitehouse Web site is bugged
To: <funsec () linuxbox org>
Message-ID: <4iore0$5kadse () smtp02 mrf mail rcn net>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"

According to the Webtrends P3P "privacy" policy, they intend to figure
out
who people are via their Webtrends cookies.  A pretty odd thing for a
Web
statistics company to be doing.  I always assumed that the company
gathers
aggregrated statistics.  I guess not.

It does look like the Bush Administration is making up the rules as it
goes
along and not telling anyone about them.

The real puzzler for me however is why does the Administration
apparently
not want older Web pages archived in the WayBack Machine?

Richard 

-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On
Behalf Of Paul Schmehl
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 3:05 PM
To: funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: Re: [funsec] The Whitehouse Web site is bugged

--On December 27, 2005 11:43:56 AM -0500 "Richard M. Smith" 
<rms () computerbytesman com> wrote:

The Whitehouse.gov Web site is bugged!  Apparently the Webmaster
for 
the site has hired Webtrends to track visitors around the site
using 
Web bugs and permanent cookies.  Here's the Web bug that I found on 
the home page of the Whitehouse.gov Web site:

<SCRIPT src="/js/stat.js" language="javascript"
TYPE="text/javascript"></SCRIPT>
<NOSCRIPT>
<IMG ALT="" BORDER="0" NAME="DCSIMG" WIDTH="1" HEIGHT="1"

SRC="http://statse.webtrendslive.com/DCSArO55rNH8I36lrbe6wexE5_5B8I/nj
s.g if? dcsuri=/nojavascript&amp;WT.js=No">
</NOSCRIPT>

Similar Web bugs can be found on other Web pages at the Whitehouse
Web 
site.

Before 9/11, the Clinton administration said this kind of Web
tracking 
is a no-no for U.S. government Web sites:

   http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/m00-13.html

   Because of the unique laws and traditions about
   government access to citizens' personal information,
   the presumption should be that "cookies" will not be
   used at Federal web sites. Under this new Federal policy,
   "cookies" should not be used at Federal web sites, or
   by contractors when operating web sites on behalf of
   agencies, unless, in addition to clear and conspicuous
   notice, the following conditions are met: a compelling
   need to gather the data on the site;

Apparently the present administration disagrees.  I'm not sure why the
government should be prevented from using cookies or other tracking
mechanisms.  After all, they can be used to improve service, something
the
government desperately needs to do.

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.





_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: