Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N
From: Gary Driggs <gdriggs () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 03:28:52 -0800
On Nov 26, 2012, at 1:47 AM, "Julius Kivimäki" <julius.kivimaki () gmail com> wrote:
Is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Linux not a vulnerability if it requires authentication?
It was not made clear that it was a privilege escalation... "Authenticate and browse to /setup.cgi? ... All the fields you see are vulnerables to command execution as root." So what kind of credentials are used for the initial authentication? Unprivileged? Then it should be mentioned as such. Otherwise, I can point out a few dozen embedded systems with web UIs that allow me to make configuration changes after authentication because that's why they're there. Now if you can point out a way to bypass authentication or escalate privileges from an account that doesn't normally have write access, you've got a vulnerability. I was merely asking how this differed from any other auth wall. -Gary _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Manu (Nov 22)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Gary Driggs (Nov 26)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Manu (Nov 26)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Julius Kivimäki (Nov 26)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Gary Driggs (Nov 26)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Benji (Nov 26)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Gary (Nov 28)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Ulisses Montenegro (Nov 28)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N Gary Driggs (Nov 26)
- Re: Remote Command Execution on Cisco WAG120N gremlin (Nov 27)