Re: Skype account + IM history hijack vulnerability

[Benji <me () b3nji com>]

Furthermore, I didn't say you we're talking about a '0day'. It was an example. 

Re never seeing anyone call it user enumeration; do you live in a cave of some sort? This is what all a) major tools 
classify it as b) cve issuings classifies it as c) major infosec providers such as pentest companies.



Sent from my iPhone

On 15 Nov 2012, at 18:59, klondike <klondike () klondike es> wrote:

> El 15/11/12 09:47, Benji escribió:
> > Sometimes when people argue over the definition of '0day', it is important to be clear.
> I never called my attack a 0-day, did I?
> > Although the bash script made it clear, I have never ever seen someone call 'user enumeration' an 'oracle attack'.
> Turns out I have never seen anybody call an 'oracle attack' 'user
> enumeration'.
> > Probably because this is 2012 and the Matrix hasn't just come out.
> Probably because the attack won't give you the whole list of usernames
> but instead tell you which e-mails (not necessarily being an username)
> on your list are on its list. Also turns out the concept of oracle has
> been in use on the computation world way before you think and before the
> OWASP guys arbitrarily decided such a name in, amongst others, the
> complexity theorems that keep the cryptography used nowadays secure, so,
> please, stop acting childishly over something as stupid as the name of
> the attack and concentrate instead on the exposed issue.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/