Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit?
From: GloW - XD <doomxd () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:46:02 +1100
Yes is legit,... however thats a backdoored copy i believe, the actual 'proper' , has a execl() type method... no shellcode, and, no evil ;) On 4 October 2011 01:31, Darren Martyn <d.martyn.fulldisclosure () gmail com>wrote:
I regularly trawl Pastebin.com to find code - often idiots leave some 0day and similar there and it is nice to find. Well, seeing as I have no test boxes at the moment, can someone check this code in a VM? I am not sure if it is legit or not. http://pastebin.com/ygByEV2e Thanks :) ~Darren _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit?, (continued)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? halfdog (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Andrew Farmer (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? GloW - XD (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? nix (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? GloW - XD (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Laurelai (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? GloW - XD (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Nathaniel Hirsch (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Andrew Farmer (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Guillaume Friloux (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? GloW - XD (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? VeNoMouS (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? adam (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? VeNoMouS (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? adam (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? xD 0x41 (Oct 04)