Re: proving _anything_ in the Coq proof assistant (in addition to code execution). ``coqchk'' passes too

[Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>]

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:27:29PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> 10x.
>
> what about this scenario, is it reallistic:
>
> i claim i have a proof of X. the proof is thousands of files. 
> lambda.v is the plugin and coqc is invoked on only top.v ?

if i read the fine manual, i would have saved myself the ocaml troubles

  Theorem really: True = False.
  Proof.
    external "/bin/sh" "ESCAPE_SEQ; write_vo_proof; nicely_kill_coq ;" True.
    (* this invokes /bin/sh. suited for formal software verification *)
  Qed.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/