Re: nuclear plants reach software quality levels

[Peter Osterberg <j () vel nu>]

Interesting...!

Does that mean that there is a 100 percent risk of the same tsunami over
500 years? Is there a cycle? When was the last one? Risk would be a lot
higher than 10 percent if it was, say, 300 years since the last tsunami....

Haven't dug at all into it, this is just a very spontaneous thought...

Georgi Guninski skrev 2011-03-30 12:50:
> <quote>
> The research paper concluded that there was a roughly 10 percent chance that a tsunami could test or overrun the 
> defenses of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant within a 50-year span based on the most conservative 
> assumptions.
> But Tokyo Electric did nothing to change its safety planning based on that study, which was presented at a nuclear 
> engineering conference in Miami in July 2007.
> [1]
> </quote>
>
> on top of it their measuring devices overflowed:
>
> <quote>
> Those levels may be higher still, but authorities say 1,000 millisieverts is the upper limit of their measuring 
> devices. [2]
> </quote>
>
> [1] http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/29/us-japa-nuclear-risks-idUSTRE72S2UA20110329
> [2] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471904576229854179642220.html#
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/