Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: encrypt the bash history


From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 06:44:47 +0000

This may/may not be relevant to your interests.

Me and a friend once stumbled across a lovely sys admin many years ago, that
patched bash to force it to log remotely (no I don't have the source).

Long story short, it got the desired effect that the sys admin was wanting
lol.

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Zach C. <fxchip () gmail com> wrote:

Pretty much what the others said with the addition that if you can't trust
root, you simply cannot trust *any* command on that machine, including gpg,
since root can compromise them in many ways, too. Best bet is to download it
every session and clear it -- but be warned that even any method used to
clear it can have a trap that secretly backs it up, however unlikely.

Bottom line -- either trust root or don't use the machine. Those are your
options if you feel paranoid enough that you don't want root always watching
you.

It's worth pointing out, by the way, that there are ways of watching your
program executions without using your bash history, like auditd for example.
In fact, I was able to write a script to parse auditd logs out to do just
that in a really easy-to-read way -- "user (running as user2) ran
/usr/bin/ssh with args: ssh user@host ..."
On Feb 6, 2011 6:18 AM, "Emanuel dos Reis Rodrigues" <
emanueldosreis () gmail com> wrote:

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: