Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity)
From: Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:32:33 -0500 (EST)
This is afaik a patched CVE in Linux glibc [1] which can be triggered through the very secure ftp daemon [2] so it will only work on older linux distros. Be aware that vsftpd has privilege seperation built in so this bug will not yield a root shell. It could yield root only in junction with a linux kernel vulnerability because the attacker will not be able to break the chroot without being root. This bug has a low severity because it's hard to exploit. Linux systems without patched glibc are vulnerable even if the latest version vsftpd-2.3.4 is installed. The bug is in the glibc timezone code. vsftpd loads timezone files from /usr [3]. If the attacker is inside a chroot he can easily create this directory and the timezone file and trigger the heap overrun. A Debugging Session illustrating the bug can be found on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRCuozBM_dQ
I did a brief analysis of this issue. And it seems vsftpd does not add anything to this as an attack vector. Althought we can control the size of the chunk to be allocated (i.e. transitions), and can arbitrarily allocate this chunk from fast bins, the main arena, or eventually, a new mmap()'ed heap. We do not have any control over when its adjacent chunks are allocated, freed, the type of their contents, when they will be used, how they will be used, and if they will be used and useful at all. In addition, the data used to overflow (i.e. transition times) are read and decoded as 4-byte integers in network (big-endian) byte order, which increases the difficulty in faking any structure, such as the adjacent allocated chunk to, at least, get outside of glibc scope after the overflow--since all return paths from __tzfile_read frees our controlled previously allocated chunk. Do you or anyone know a way to potentially exploit this vulnerability?
Cheers!
Thanks,
[1] http://dividead.wordpress.com/tag/heap-overflow/ [2] https://security.appspot.com/vsftpd.html [3] For example /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC-01:00 /Kingcope
-- Ramon de C Valle / Red Hat Security Response Team _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) HI-TECH . (Dec 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) Ramon de C Valle (Dec 12)
- Message not available
- Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) HI-TECH . (Dec 09)
- Re: Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) GloW - XD (Dec 09)
- Re: Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) GloW - XD (Dec 09)
- Message not available
- Re: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) Ramon de C Valle (Dec 12)
- Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) HI-TECH . (Dec 12)
- Re: Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) Ramon de C Valle (Dec 12)
- Re: Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) Daniel J Walsh (Dec 13)
- Re: Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) Ramon de C Valle (Dec 12)
- Re: Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) Daniel J Walsh (Dec 13)
- Re: Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) Ramon de C Valle (Dec 12)
- Fwd: VSFTPD Remote Heap Overrun (low severity) HI-TECH . (Dec 12)