Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:41:05 +0100
Because it's bugtraq / full-disclosure, where people generally talk about vulnerabilities...
Sure thing. Complaining about patches that don't do anything<http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2011/12/x-frame-options-or-solving-wrong.html>is a plus to your reputation, I guess, right? Finding tangible solutions to your problems means that eventually you'll loose the job.
I'm not sure I follow your drift about Firefox, I don't believe it's mentioned anywhere.
Indeed, you didn't mention Firefox. Someone else did.
Why?
It's harder to predict how much it would take for a page to load, as well as your caching concept will fail when the target in question can only be invoked by the user. Also, there's the situation where a simple click won't get you anywhere, for instance, in cases where a user has to enter his credentials as well as to confirm the action. Chris.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected Michal Zalewski (Dec 10)
- Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected xD 0x41 (Dec 10)
- Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected Dave (Dec 10)
- Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected Christian Sciberras (Dec 10)
- Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected Michal Zalewski (Dec 10)
- Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected Christian Sciberras (Dec 11)
- Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected Michal Zalewski (Dec 11)
- Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected Michal Zalewski (Dec 10)