Re: the real stuxnet authors plz stand up

["Kenneth Voort" <kenneth () voort ca>]

Get real...
Kenneth Voort
kenneth () voort ca | 647.987.5381

-Sent from my handheld.

-----Original Message-----
From: coderman <coderman () gmail com>
Sender: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:57:35 
To: Full Disclosure<full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] the real stuxnet authors plz stand up

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, coderman <coderman () gmail com> wrote:
> stuxnet is strategic, and misleading...

misleading because the failures induced in target present as
inefficiencies and mechanical fatigue in centrifuge process; intent is
to cast suspicion and resources on manufacturing and/or assembly of
centrifuge hardware as cursory checks of digital systems (data
presumably acquired from floor) return normative.

good game, sirs!
 target spends dollars and weeks/months pursuing errors in physical
supply and installation paths en-route to / on site, all the while the
wear is digitally done; out of sight, out of mind...

this game (offensive, methodical, precision targeted high-assurance
malware) is an odd sort of global-actor assasination politik. like
china blasting sats in space, it was bound to happen sooner or later
:P

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/