Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: go public to avoid jail
From: Marsh Ray <marsh () extendedsubset com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 12:40:27 -0500
On 5/3/2010 12:29 PM, J Roger wrote:
If the tool was released publicly, how much more difficult would it have been for the prosecution to prove that you knew the tool was intended to be used for a particular illegal purpose in a specific case and you went out of your way to help?
Perhaps not more difficult at all. My understanding is (I think I read the Wired article) that in this case there were voluminous chat logs between the developer of the tool and those who used it for specific crimes. These logs showed that it was custom development work and its intended purpose was well-understood by the developer. - Marsh _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: go public to avoid jail, (continued)
- Re: go public to avoid jail Ed Carp (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail J Roger (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail T Biehn (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail Ed Carp (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail J Roger (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail J Roger (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail PsychoBilly (May 04)
- Re: go public to avoid jail Christian Sciberras (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail Marsh Ray (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail PsychoBilly (May 04)
- Re: go public to avoid jail mutiny (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail PsychoBilly (May 05)
- Re: go public to avoid jail J Roger (May 05)
- Re: go public to avoid jail J Roger (May 05)
- Re: go public to avoid jail T Biehn (May 03)
- Re: go public to avoid jail Ed Carp (May 03)