Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: there might be three people who missed it...


From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:26:44 +0200

Adding to Kletnieks', for what it's worth, chemistry students study the
chemical formula of C-4 during under-graduate level education (well,
actually it is trinitrotoluene, but hey, it's just a bit less powerful)...






On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:56 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:24:07 PDT, "andrew.wallace" said:
Are you trying to say no disclosure will ever come under the profile of
cyber
terrorism?

No, I'm saying that claiming *every* disclosure *is* "cyber terrorism" is
lunacy.  I've yet to see *anybody* other than yourself claim that Ormandy's
disclosure qualified as terrorism of any sort, cyber or otherwise.  That
leaves
one of two possibilities:

1) Ten years from now, we'll be wondering how all tens of thousands of
people
in the computer security field totally got it wrong and you were the only
one
who got it right.

2) The reverse of (1).

Hint:  Unrecognized geniuses are so frikkin' rare they teach you about
them in school.  Unrecognized idiots are much more common.

(Although I *would* enjoy seeing you come up with a *plausible* example
where
the disclosure *itself* qualified as terrorism, separate from what uses are
made of it.  For example - although terrorists have used C-4, the invention
of
C-4 is not *itself* terrorism.  Remember to keep that distinction straight
in
your scenario).


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: