Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?


From: "McGhee, Eddie" <Eddie.McGhee () ncr com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:20:11 -0500

and also lol @ maybe USELESS, try making the MAYBE in caps..

________________________________
From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of T 
Biehn
Sent: 27 January 2010 12:28
To: Bipin Gautam
Cc: full-disclosure
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?


No you don't understand, your premise is shit. Research what's already being done instead of trying to improve what you 
don't understand.

lol @ ddos.

On Jan 26, 2010 11:09 PM, "Bipin Gautam" <bipin.gautam () gmail com<mailto:bipin.gautam () gmail com>> wrote:

Enough noise, Lets wrap up:

Someone said: "Forensics requires more than merely finding a phrase or
file on a hard drive - it requires establishing the context. If a
court accepts evidence without that context, then the defendant should
appeal on the basis of having an incompetent lawyer."

So, any evidence/broken-text/suspicious phrases etc found in a
computer "without meta-data" maybe USELESS........... REMEMBER.


Having a normal OS with forensic signature ZERO would be a simple yet
powerful project. Programmers??? it isnt difficult work..... few
months, 1 person project.

Worm defense is smart as well as deadlock at times, the prospective i
presented can be used as a FALLBACK at times.


Maybe something like Alice/chatterbox run through the
free/slack/etc... space of your 1 TB harddisk is a intellectual dDoS!

_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http:/...
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: