[US-2010-xmas]: American Women are lazy, hypocritical, corpulent, psychotic thieves. People are treacherous and worthless.

[Josey Yelsef <hg_exposed () yahoo com>]

Yes sheep, hypocrisy is here.

Related: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Nov/125

In the form of your 500 pound "BBW" wife. Enjoy the pig owning your house and driving your life into the ground.

Have you ever seen rape before? You need not look far. View the dockets in any divorce court to see total tyranny.

Yes ur honor I would like to file a "0day". This is more important than any wikileak.

This here is a public service to the human species and my the people of my country (in addition to my usual steady 
stream of criminal complaints against frauds, hackers and the like) Manufactured * is the new fetish around here. 
Self-absorbed decadence and thuggery is the new thing eh? Wake up. Wake up and read... Learn. Absorb intelligence.

We live in a generation of bullshitters and liars folks. It's time to wake up and take responsibility. Reclaim honor 
and virtue.

2010-12-23. URL:http://dontmarry.wordpress.com/. Accessed: 2010-12-23. (Archived by WebCite® at 
http://www.webcitation.org/5vCeVfZsb)

 "What I'm saying is that human beings are nasty weak treacherous creatures that are for the most part totally 
untrustworthy. Experience is my basis for this statement, both mine and others who I know or who have written reliable 
histories. If you can find a woman to be your companion who is not treacherous, a deceitful little actress, a sly whore 
or a manipulative nag or a shrieking hag, then you are among the lucky few. Congratulations. I hope your luck continues 
to hold out.

Enter the truth. Have a few pages of crystallized purity. Enjoy:


This writing seeks to educate men about the realities of what they may be getting into when they marry a Western Woman. 
An informed decision is less likely to be one that may be regretted later in the marriage. The intent is not to 
dissuade men from marrying, but to encourage them to communicate frankly their concerns and expectations regarding 
marriage with their potential spouses. The secondary aim of this essay is to enlighten women to a few of the reasons 
why increasingly larger numbers of successful, eligible, unmarried men, who would otherwise prefer monogamous long-term 
relationships, are turning their backs on marriage.


Society typically paints a negative stereotype of men who hesitate, delay, or elect not to marry.


They are labeled as either:

A) Womanisers who are unable to participate in a long term relationship, or
B) Selfish, childish or irresponsible men who can not take care of themselves or another person.


No other explanation is ever explored.

The cost of proclaiming your undying love

In University, in professional sports, in politics, in the workplace; women have the same educational and professional 
career opportunities as men. Contrary to commonly believed feminist propaganda, women do indeed get paid the same 
salary as men, given that they are willing to work the same types of jobs as men, and work as many hours as the men do. 
Despite this reality, many women come into marriage with very few assets, and often are saddled with substantial 
quantities of debt. In general, men are the ones who save and invest. Don’t believe me? Count the number of women of 
marrying age that you know who subscribe to financial services magazines or newspapers. A significant number of 
20-something and 30-something women spend all of their disposable income on luxury rental apartments, upscale 
restaurants, frequent exotic vacations, leased cars, spa treatments, and excessive amounts of clothing, purses, shoes 
and accessories. Yet ironically, in the
 media, men are the ones who are portrayed as reckless, irresponsible spendthrifts.


When marriage enters the picture, double standards and financial imbalances leave responsible men to pick up the slack 
and fix the mess she may have made of her finances. Men are forced to spend their hard-earned savings, or take out an 
usurious loan, on a diamond ring. Women justify this relatively recent, mid-20th Century ritual, which was spawned by a 
brilliant 1940′s mass-brainwashing campaign launched by DeBeers, by insisting that a man wants to buy her a diamond and 
that it makes him proud to be able to proclaim his love and affection towards her in this fashion. Granted there are 
some men who may be inclined to declare their commitment to a life-long partner in this way, but there are plenty of 
men whom seek a lifelong partnership and commitment who have no interest in buying diamonds. What choice do these men 
have? None! To many young men, the ring, catered wedding, and honeymoon in an exotic locale at a five-star hotel is an 
unwelcome land
 mine on their journey towards adult financial stability and independence. To add insult to injury, he is now locked 
into a lifetime of insurance payments for this grossly overpriced jewelry. Contrary to popularly held belief diamonds 
are not rare at all, but instead are common and inexpensive. Their high price is due to their supply having been 
artificially manipulated. Some men are more concerned with realising their dream of owning a home and becoming 
financially stable enough to begin a family and responsibly provide for their welfare. Men worry about these matters, 
because, ultimately, it becomes their sole responsibility.


The purchase of the diamond ring is a predictor of things to come. Immediately after buying it, the man may be rewarded 
with bridal demands to finance all or part of a lavish wedding, depending upon the size of his bank account and the 
ambitions of his fiancée. The average costs of today’s Western Weddings frequently exceed that of a house down payment 
or, in certain parts of the world, the entire cost of the house itself. If a man enters a marriage having saved up a 
down payment for his dream home, it can suddenly be snatched right out from underneath him. Many men may object to 
spending such a large sum of money on what is basically a very expensive one-day, four-hour party. He also will be 
spending a year of his life planning it, when he could use the same time to further his career or education. However, 
what a man wants is really not of any concern anymore at this point in the proceedings. His wants, desires, hopes and 
dreams are ignored almost
 in their entirety. Her opinions regarding the wedding are frequently non-negotiable. A wedding is no longer an event 
that is equally for the bride and groom. As many of today’s Bridezilla’s will gleefully remind you, “Today is MY day!”. 
This gives her licence to become selfish, irresponsible, demanding and childlike. A man who balks at spending his 
entire life savings, or shouldering a five-figure debt load, for the ring, catered wedding and honeymoon in an exotic 
locale at a five-star hotel, can and will be labeled as a selfish cheapskate or not a “Real Man”. If a woman leaves 
such a man for him suggesting that they try to keep their costs under control, she would have the full support of 
everyone around her as she dumped him.


“She can do better”, “Clearly, he doesn’t love her”, “He doesn’t deserve her”, and similar sentiments will be muttered 
in quiet circles just out of his earshot. This is a sign of her good self-esteem and healthy self-image, and a sign 
that she won’t settle for anything less. She is the poster girl for the Modern, Independent Woman.

Imagine if a man demanded equal treatment and asked that she buy him a new bass boat, and a two-week bear hunt in 
Siberia as a condition of marriage. This would be viewed as absurd, yet women do it every day. Modern Western Marriage 
is supposedly an equal partnership, isn’t it?


The injustices go from bad to worse when children enter the picture. If he can afford to carry the entire familial 
financial burden, the woman may now elect to stop working entirely. She will often make this decision regardless of how 
he may feel about it. The day she stops working is the day that all of her past financial baggage unequivocally gets 
tossed onto his shoulders. If the woman has racked up substantial credit card debts, these are now his payments to 
make; if the woman has not bothered to pay off her student loans, these become his responsibility; if she owes an 
enormous sum on her luxury car note, it is up to him to pay it off. Irony of ironies is that he is now paying for her 
degree and she isn’t even working anymore! Can he object? Can he say: “No Honey, you made your mess, and it should not 
be my job to clean it up. You knew that you wanted kids even before you met me, and you should have planned ahead.” No, 
he cannot. The payments
 can’t be deferred until she is once again able to continue repaying them herself, not if he wants to retain a clean 
credit rating to get a loan for their dream home. If he even suggested that she return to work to pay off some of her 
own debt load, he opens himself to criticisms of being an unsupportive husband and bad father who is endangering the 
welfare of his children. Now the noose tightens and the responsible husband compensates for the mother’s freewheeling 
and irresponsible past, and begins slowly to pay off her old debts. In the most twisted turn of events yet, the debt he 
is paying off may often be on credit cards used to finance Vacations, Hotel Rooms and Christmas gifts shared with 
previous husbands, boyfriends, fiancés and lovers. Caveat Emptor! This is the reward for today’s man who works hard, 
makes sacrifices, plans ahead, and invests wisely. By getting married to the typical Modern, Western Woman, the man is 
certainly susceptible
 to being railroaded into this situation, because it is completely acceptable within today’s gender roles and societal 
norms.

Marriage can mean career slavery

Anyone who says, “Slavery is dead” clearly has not contemplated the predicament of the average Western Husband, where a 
good paycheck can mean career slavery. Merriam-Webster’s English Dictionary defines slavery as “…(T)he state of a 
person who is a chattel (an item of tangible movable or immovable property) of another person.” If the husband earns 
enough to support both of them, he would be hard pressed to make an argument to preserve equality and have her continue 
working as he does. If the wife decides to stop working, the man who has been left holding the financial bag finds his 
options very limited. He may find himself working in a career that he hates, for abusive and exploitative management, 
excessively long hours, in a position that is physically dangerous or demanding, in an organisation that has no growth 
potential, far away from home. At this point, considering the corner he’s been painted into, he is often powerless to 
affect
 any positive, meaningful change in his own life. He may have been harbouring delusions that once his wife was able to 
return to work, he would be able to gain some flexibility to rectify some of the shortcomings in his own career. 
Perhaps changing careers or accepting a lower salary at a different firm in exchange for better hours, a shorter 
commute, or more fulfilling work. Nevertheless, the distinct reality is that he will continue to shoulder the financial 
responsibilities of his family alone. His reward for working hard and getting ahead is to become trapped into his 
career, and become a specialised beast of burden to an emotionally and financially dependent family. Does it really pay 
to work hard anymore and apply oneself to his full potential?

If she stops working, she may never work again.

There are many debates about the merits of a stay-at-home mother vs. a working mother. My goal here is to simply 
educate the prospective husband on frequently unseen risks he is taking on when he agrees to accept 100% of the 
financial burden to allow his wife to stay at home. An informed decision is less likely to be one that may be regretted 
later in the marriage.


Every parent will agree that staying home with children is backbreaking and often mind-numbing labour. Many new fathers 
may concede that it is much easier to go to work than to stay at home with several children. However, the greatest 
imbalance in efforts and contributions to a marriage can manifest once all of the children are of school age. The house 
is now empty from 8am-3pm. The wife has 7 hours to herself while the kids are at school and the husband is at work. 
After a few years of hard work at home, many wives may feel entitled to “kick back” and take it easy. The good, 
supportive husband, however, has worked those same years, has done his 50/50 of the housework, and is still working 
just as hard to support the family once the kids are in school. His workload has not diminished, and it may have even 
increased as her expectations rise. He is rarely afforded the same option to scale back his daytime efforts.


What motivation does the modern wife have to return to work? Very little. For several years now, the man’s salary has 
been enough to live on. Otherwise, she would have been working to make ends meet. Unless tight finances dictate that 
she must return to work, the husband really has little say in this matter. The wife can hide behind many different 
excuses in order not to work, despite having little to do from 8am-3pm. Among the commonest are:


“I’m busy with the housework”
It is easy to exaggerate the labours of daily housework. Yet how long does it take to throw clothes or dishes into the 
washer, and remove them later? Vacuuming can be done in 1 hour a week. Grocery shopping is another hour per week. A 
decent meal can be prepared in under an hour. Does all of this add up to 7 hours a day? The lie that housework is hard, 
time-consuming drudgery is no longer as persuasive as it may have been in the past, because in an age of later 
marriage, many men are already experienced in cooking, cleaning, and general housekeeping and know that it doesn’t take 
that much effort or time. Humourously, not every stay-at-home-wife even performs all of these duties.


“I can’t find a job”
She has been out of work too long, and therefore is unable to find a job. This may be true, but many men do not 
consider this risk when they agree to support her while she “temporarily” stops working. Hopefully now they will, and 
can make a more informed decision. Many wives may use this as a convenient scapegoat to stop looking for any job at 
all. The next section describes how this can be used against him in the event of divorce.


“It doesn’t pay for me to work”
In the short run, the expenses of returning to work such as gas, lunch, clothes and day care may not make it worthwhile 
for her to return to the workforce. This may be true, but does that justify her playing tennis, drinking lattes and 
‘catching up with her friends’ while her husband toils away? Many couples may be too shortsighted to thoroughly and 
comprehensively think through this issue. Initially, the cost to benefits ratio may not be ideal, but her returning to 
work will improve her job skills and network of contacts and over time the return on investment will improve. More so 
than strolling through the local mall every afternoon and window-shopping for new window treatments. Over time, as her 
career gets back on track, and she becomes qualified for better jobs, her salary should also improve.

It should be duly noted that some working wives view their salary as “personal spending money”, and still expect the 
man to pay all or most of the bills. Western Women are often heard to claim that, “What’s mine is mine, and what’s his 
is ours.”

Even more unfair double standards that favour wives

Cheating
If a married man cheats, he’s the scum of the earth. He is a selfish jerk that has jeopardised the family unit, done 
his ‘thinking with his little head’, and disrespected his wife and children. However, when the woman cheats, she’s 
portrayed as the victim of an insensitive and inattentive husband. “Poor thing, he ignores her. It is for her 
empowerment, to boost her ego. She deserves it after bearing and rearing his children.” It’s good for her self-esteem. 
Worse, her cheating is portrayed as the man’s fault. If he works long hours to provide for her and the children, he 
works too much. If he is tired at the end of the day from 13 hours of manual labour, then he doesn’t compliment her as 
much as she wants. Into this vacuum of conflicting expectations steps the first man who “makes me feel like a Real 
Woman again…”. You read that correctly; the man who is scrambling to pay the mortgage and car payments and is working 
double shifts
 to pay for the consumer goods she demanded to have is now considered a negligent and emotionally abusive husband. The 
man who may be working two jobs to allow her to be home with her kids is now considered a candidate for Domestic 
Violence.


When a woman cheats, the first thing people ask is what he did, or more often, didn’t do, to drive her into the arms of 
another man.

When a man cheats, no one ever asks the same question.

When a woman cheats, the reaction will be; “Oh, poor thing, I guess her husband couldn’t get the job done in the 
bedroom”.

When a man cheats, no one ever stops to think; “Oh poor fellow, his wife was horrible in bed.”


Let’s not forget what happens if a man were to leave his wife for a younger woman. This will become fodder at the 
coffee shop for months. It is automatically assumed that he is a shallow sex maniac whose only motivation was to be 
with a younger woman. The possibility that his wife was of a generation of women who were taught to hate men and that 
younger women do not, that she was lazy, or a reckless spendthrift, or verbally or physically abusive, or grossly 
overweight, or an incompetent mother, are rarely considered and are often totally ignored. The myth is that the only 
reason a man leaves his wife is to be with a younger, more attractive woman. Never mind if she is a better match for 
him and a more supportive, nurturing mate.


Pre-Nups
If a man insists on a Pre-Nup, he is selfish and unromantic. However, when is the last time a woman who demanded a 
Pre-Nup was called “unromantic”? On the contrary, if a woman requests a Pre-Nup, she is being fiscally responsible, 
sensible and looking out for herself. (Note: If your fiancée refuses to sign a Pre-Nup, she has just shown her hand. 
Best to leave now.) Why is it that a woman can refuse a Pre-Nup, and it is accepted by society? In reality, the man 
should be outraged that she is after a legal contract, and not love.

What is astounding is the hypocrisy of the usual reaction towards Pre-Nups. Women can conveniently assert that a man is 
unromantic if he suggests a Pre-Nup. After all, how can a man pollute true love with the signing of legal paperwork! 
However, what is a marriage licence? Nothing more than a legal contract entered into between the man, woman and local 
and state government authorities. A woman does not seem to balk at signing this legal paperwork, which entitles her to 
at least half the assets a man has accumulated as well as half of everything he earns in the future, and obligates him 
to support her in perpetuity in the event of a breakup. Why aren’t men allowed to note how unromantic this contract is? 
The distraction of bridal magazines, place setting selection, floral arrangements, wedding dresses, receptions, wedding 
showers, and honeymoons have clouded the legal reality of what men are getting themselves into. Marriage is as much an 
unromantic
 legal contract as a prenuptial agreement is.


Initially, Pre-Nups were devised as a way to protect women. Nuptial agreements were popularised in the 19th century, 
mostly to protect heiresses from marrying men who were “out for their money”. Until the Married Women’s Property Act of 
1848, under English Common Law, a woman’s property, upon marriage, was usually transferred to her husband.


“Stupid, Irresponsible” Men
Men are severely abused in our media, quite frankly. Just watch any TV commercial or sitcom and see how they portray 
men as idiots, dolts, or well intentioned, if bumbling, buffoons. If women were portrayed in commercials in the same 
fashion, “Women’s Organisations” would have a fit. If it weren’t for their wives in these shows and ads the men would 
be lost “animals”, unable to feed themselves or perform even the simplest of tasks. Other commercials make it appear 
that men act without thinking, only responding in an impulsive and irrational manner, and that the wife is the brains 
of the family. Even many women will agree that women often are the ones who act upon emotions and make judgments solely 
based up on emotional attachments and not logic or reason. Almost every “couples budgeting” article will portray the 
woman as the one who has to rein in the man’s childish spending, when in truth it is usually the woman who cannot 
control her
 expenditures.


Job Loss
If a husband loses his job and is having trouble finding work, the wife is completely and totally justified in 
threatening to leave him. However, can you imagine the reaction if a husband threatened to leave a wife who was in the 
exact same position? He would be vilified! If a man loses his job, the woman is justified in resenting the fact that 
the financial burden lies on her. He is no longer a ‘good provider’. When is a man allowed to resent this very same 
predicament? If a man is laid off and cares for the household and kids while the wife is working, he may be accused of 
not pulling his weight! Yet this is exactly the same situation that women demand more recognition for with each passing 
year! No matter what role the man plays, he loses!


Traditional Roles
It is perfectly acceptable for a woman to demand that a man make a certain salary, drive a certain car, live in a 
certain part of the city, have a certain job, have the ‘right’ manners, talk a certain way, walk a certain way, behave 
a certain way, have a degree from the ‘right’ University and dress in a stylish fashion, to be deemed “marriage 
material” and be able to provide her with the stability she feels she deserves. If a man demands his wife do the 
cooking and cleaning, he can now be labeled old fashioned and sexist. If he asks her to carry her weight financially, 
just as he does, he may be criticised as an inadequate provider. If a man insists that his wife honor the conjugal 
requirements of the marriage contract, he can and will be accused of sexual abuse, sexual assault or rape.


To add insult to injury, some women have gotten so pampered that they not only quit their jobs the day they find out 
they are pregnant, but they then go out and hire as many nannies, cooks, gardeners and pool boys as their husband can 
afford. Many Western Wives stay at home and hire someone else to rear the kids and clean up, while they drink lattes 
and go shopping all day with other pampered “stay-at-home” mothers. Does it pay to work hard and get ahead anymore, if 
this is how your hard-earned money is squandered?

The concept of the pampered wife is a relatively new one. Most of Western Civilisation was primarily an agricultural 
economy even up until the 1920′s and 1930’s. Western Wives contributed to the well being of the household by helping on 
the farm. A man needed a wife as an equal partner. It was not until the 1950′s that the first generation of Western 
Wives, first in The States and later in Europe, Australia and New Zealand, began to emerge as dead weight. Perhaps this 
coincides with the spiking of the divorce rate in The States, and later Europe and the other English Speaking Nations, 
and the rise of Feminism. Perhaps men have become tired of giving so much, while getting so little in exchange.


Divorce

43% of Western Marriages end in divorce, and 70% to 93% of these divorces are initiated by women.

All men should consult a legal professional before marrying, and understand the implications of divorce, because the 
chances are 1-in-3 that they will participate in one whether they like it, want it, inititate it or not.


Upon divorce, all assets accumulated during and prior to a marriage are subject to division. It has become, simply put. 
a licence to steal. Even if the woman has not worked in years, and has spent the intervening decade(s) shopping and 
lunching from 8am-3pm, she is entitled to half, or more, of everything the man worked for during the course of the 
marriage. Is this fair? How many people would ever agree to a job contract that stipulated that in the event of 
separation that one party would have to return 50% of the gross amount of everything in the pay packet? No one in his 
or her right mind would knowingly sign such an agreement. Yet Western Men unknowingly agree to the exact same insanity 
each time they sign their marriage contract!


“Assets accumulated prior to a marriage are exempt from a divorce”. In theory this is true, in practice it is not. If 
funds from an account are commingled or combined, it can become marital property. How do funds become commingled, or 
mixed? If even the smallest sum from a prior account is spent towards the marriage, all of that account will now be 
considered marital property. Buy your child a lollipop from your own account, and a good lawyer will take one-half of 
it for your ex-wife when you divorce. If a woman moves into a home the man owned prior to the marriage, it is not safe 
from divorce. If she so much as hangs up a sheet of wallpaper, puts up draperies, paints a wall, or installs a light 
fixture, the home is now classified as joint marital property, and is now subject to equal division. Worse actually, 
the man can be ejected from the home if she makes a false claim of domestic violence, physical abuse, verbal abuse or 
child abuse. Where is
 the equality and fairness?

Note: “Equal Division” is also somewhat of a misnomer. Often, she can get upwards of 70% – 90% of the assets, while the 
man gets the majority of the debts! She gets all of the benefits, he gets all of the responsibilities. This, of course, 
is just and right and is his reward for working so hard all of those years. He can afford it; she can’t because she was 
not working.

If you pamper your wife, it can be used against you

Imagine that in the spirit of generosity and kindness that you gave a beggar a hot meal. A generous act, indeed. Now 
imagine your reaction if that same beggar sues you in court. He is petitioning the judge to have you keep providing him 
with the food that you gave him willingly, freely, out of a big heart. The judge orders you to keep feeding the 
homeless man meals, indefinitely, forever, because he has become accustomed to eating those meals! This is 
categorically absurd, yet this happens to Western Men in divorce court every day. Instead of thanking you for paying 
her bills for all those years, what you get is the privilege of being legally forced to pay her bills forever!

After having children, many women demand to quit working and stay home. Before the kids came along, many of these same 
women may have been in careers they hated, working long hours, and enduring long commutes. It is the man’s generosity 
and dedication to his own career that enables her to walk away from her own career. During a marriage, a man with a 
stay-at-home wife might work long and grueling hours in order to support her. He will pay the mortgage, the property 
tax, grocery bill, phone bill, cable bill, Internet bill and electric bill. He also pays for her car, gas money, 
clothes, and vacations.


As one final slap in the face, the man may be punished for working hard enough to allow his wife to have the luxury of 
staying at home with the kids. As noted above, after the children are in school, the wife may enjoy a life of leisure 
and relaxation that is afforded to her by her man’s hard work. In the event of divorce, he will be legally obligated to 
support her for years or decades to come. Because she stopped working and led a life of leisure, the ex-husband is now 
responsible for supporting her, forever! History has a tendency of rewriting itself. Originally, a woman may have had a 
career that she may have hated, and was begging to leave. Western Women often “play” at work and career for a few years 
after University, and then when they near 30 or grow tired of the workplace they seek out a man to “take her away from 
all of this”, whatever “all of this” may be. In fact her desire to leave the world of work may have been her motivation
 to have kids in the first place. But now, in her eyes, and definitely her lawyers eyes, she “gave up” her career for 
her man and his kids. She is now “owed” all of her “lost income”. His gift of leisure and support to her has now become 
twisted and is viewed as her sacrifice! Another way in which the situation is turned against him is that he will be 
characterised as being threatened by her having her own career, and that he forced her to quit her “lucrative career” 
and stay home with the children. Her lawyer will now attempt to convince the judge that he wanted to “oppress” his wife 
and “keep her down”. Truthfully now, how many men do you personally know that are upset at having a wife that earns a 
good living? Many of these misleading stereotypes still run rampant in our society, and are routinely used to the 
woman’s advantage during a divorce. As a result of her not working, regardless of whether she was minding the home or
 not, she remains a financial liability.


Generous, caring men who spoil their wives should certainly think twice about how this generosity can later be used 
against them. The phrase used in divorce court is “She has become accustomed to a certain lifestyle”. A husband’s 
reward for spoiling his wife today is the legal obligation to spoil her indefinitely, forever. Buy her a luxury car 
today, and you may be obligated to buy her luxury cars after she leaves you for another man! Yet, imagine a husband 
that became accustomed to eating a home cooked dinner, or regular conjugal visits. Now imagine the courts obligate the 
ex-wife to continue cooking for him and sharing her bed with him and his new girlfriend each night, despite being 
divorced! Inconceivable, but it happens the other way around every day!


The ultimate insult, however, comes when the man loses half or more of his life’s assets even when she has decided to 
leave him. Yes, a wife can unilaterally decide to kick a man out of his own home, and have the courts force him to 
continue paying the bills, while she is sleeping with her new boyfriend in the very house the husband worked so long 
and hard to buy! She can, and often does, spend her alimony check on gifts for her new boyfriend or lover! How is it 
that the legal system supports a woman who feels entitled to this?

The risks are clear, yet what exactly are men getting out of marriage? Many times, the reasons men get married are 
unfounded.

Many of the traditional reasons why a man gets married are a myth.


“I won’t die alone”
Wrong. The simple fact is that one spouse WILL die alone. Visit the hospital and go to the terminally ill or cardiac 
departments. Few people have the time to sit with an ill relative all day and all night. Yes, you may get visitors, but 
they aren’t having the same thoughts as you are. You’re contemplating your mortality, while they’re wondering what food 
the hospital cafeteria offers. In the end, even with a loving and supportive family, most of us will leave this world 
alone, unless you both die simultaneously in an accident of some kind. Your spouse may die fifteen years before you, or 
you may be in the hospital for your last year. Ultimately, we all die alone. Married or not.


“I won’t grow old alone”
Not necessarily. A marriage can self-destruct at any time. Your partner may initiate divorce at age 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 
45, 50, 55, 60, 65 or 70. Many married people end up in the same position (alone) as if they had never married at all. 
Now they enter their twilight years broke, as a result of being stripped of half or more of their life’s assets, losing 
half their retirement and pension funds, and being assessed alimony payments. Experiencing financial devastation from 
one divorce often may preclude a man from ever marrying again. This is a common observation of many middle-aged Western 
Women. Q: “Where are all the men?”. A: “He is broke from the divorce settlement, alimony and child support payments.” 
Thus these women don’t find him marriable, and he grows old alone and poor.


Men are led to believe that not marrying implies only one destiny; that of a solitary monk in a cave, a shunned loner. 
However, life is not so black and white. Not marrying does not mean you cannot continue to date or have meaningful 
relationships throughout your life. There are plenty of single people in all age brackets. A bad marriage can be the 
loneliest of institutions, because most of your emotional outlet and companionship is concentrated into one person who 
gives back nothing in emotion, affection or support. Young men in their 20′s and 30′s should be more aware of the 
alternatives that exist in life. They should be aware that marriage is a choice, and is not the only path life has to 
offer. An informed decision is less likely to be one that is later regretted.


“I’ll get regular sex”
Not from Modern, Western Women. Access to regular sex is the oldest and the most frequently cited reason to marry. Many 
men now know that Modern, Western Women frequently stop having sex after just a short time of being married. There are 
plenty of “sexless” marriages. Talk to a few married couples that are honest about their relationship. One or both 
partners may stop wanting sex after kids, or the sex may be as infrequent as once a year or once every six months, or 
the wife may only have sex when she wants the husband to buy her something, take her somewhere, or remodel the house. 
Read the honest opinions of married men on the Internet. Most Western, Married Men will have more sex with their 
Western Wives in the first six months of their marriage than they will in the next 40 years. Lastly, it remains to be 
seen whether sex with one exclusive partner for forty years or more is even a natural act, or just a man-made 
convention. In many Western
 Nations, the wife is no longer required to have sex with her husband. She can deny him at any time, for any length of 
time. She can, if she wishes, deny him sex forever and there is nothing that he can do about it. In fact, if he insists 
that she honor her end of the marriage contract by being available for sexual relations, he can and will be accused of, 
charged with, and arrested for Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault or Rape.


Marriage is hardly a guarantee of regular sex, as many people are led to believe.


“I’ll have someone to cook and clean for me”
Not necessarily. While a Modern, Western Woman is perfectly justified in quitting her job in the name of staying home 
with the kids, she can also demand that the husband pay for a cook, a maid, and a nanny. This leaves the man to earn 
the money, and leaves him to pay for maintenance of household and children, while the wife gets to play at being a 
housekeeper. Today’s woman is empowered by not performing the traditional housewife duties, regardless of whether she 
is working or not. If a husband asks that his wife perform traditional household duties because she is not working, he 
will often be labeled sexist, abusive or controlling, even if he is doing his “traditional role” of paying all the 
bills, providing for his family, and performing the traditional manly duties of vehicle repairs, maintaining the lawn 
and house upkeep.


“I have to be married to have kids”
Not anymore. Her ovaries do not physically need a contract at the government center in order to be fertilised by your 
sperm. Cro-Magnon man had children long before lawyers invented marriage contracts. Often, you do not need to be 
married in order to share health benefits. You do not need to be married to designate your partner on a life insurance 
policy. You do not need to be married to own a dream home together. It is ironic that responsible parents who raise a 
healthy family, but never actually sign marriage paperwork, get less respect than divorced parents or married parents 
who are ineffective, inattentive or incompetent.


-Having a lifelong, faithful, committed relationship has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Owning a beautiful dream home together has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Rearing healthy, happy, and successful children has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Building a family and life together has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Growing old together has nothing to do with being “married”.


In fact, recent changes in cohabitation, partner and marriage law have proven that the only tangible consequence of 
marriage is having a formalised separation process that usually requires the talents of an attorney.


You do need to be married in order to throw an extravagant four-hour party, and share the same last name.

You do need to be married in order to involve the state and government in your romantic affairs.

You do need to be married in order give away half of everything you own.

Besides that, marriage does nothing more than introduce lawyers and social workers into your life. These are people 
that otherwise would have nothing to do with your life or your relationship.


Men need to stop and ask themselves:

“Why exactly am I getting married? What exactly does marriage mean to me in today’s world? What is the benefit to me to 
get married?”


It is no longer a lifelong commitment, because it can be reversed overnight on her unilateral whim.


Marriage was originally created as a way for families to merge land, property, political power and influence; perhaps 
people should return to viewing it as just that and nothing more. The rest of it is fake modern TV Fantasy and Tabloid 
Gossip and Hype polluting the minds of today’s impressionable youth, and a way to keep the multi-billion-per-year 
wedding industry chugging along. Perhaps the only criteria should be to ask oneself: “How excited am I for us to merge 
our finances and assets?” When all the fluff and hype are boiled away, that may be the only remaining reality. Spend a 
day in divorce court, and you’ll see exactly what is real and tangible and lasting about marriage. You’ll see women who 
signed the marriage contract under romantic pretenses who are now expert laymen attorneys who can cite case law. 
Bouquet throwing ex-brides now embroiled in warfare to get everything that is coming to them and more! The rest are 
myths, lies, bold
 unsubstantiated promises, and maybes. “For better or for worse…”


The Western Divorce rate is 43%. It is higher in some parts of the world such as California, Great Britain and 
Australia. In Japan the recent change in pension law may have many pensioners out on the street. In India new changes 
to dowry law have men being threatened by their wives. Consider the number of people who are in a bad marriage, but 
elect to stay; Men who don’t want to lose 50%, women who know they can’t support themselves alone. Next, think of how 
many more couples stay together just for the sake of the kids. Of these “forced marriages”, consider how many of these 
marriages involve infidelity, no sex, or sleeping in separate beds or separate rooms. I estimate the percentage of 
happy and monogamous marriages to be under 5%. Are these odds you would take in a business venture, investment or loan? 
Most of the risk-averse population would not. Yet they seek this exception to the rule everyday through marriage.


Keywords: NoMarriage, NoMarriage.com, Don't Marry


      

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/