Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory)
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:01:18 +0100
Or the worst kind of trolling to have ever walked these newsgroups.... On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, John Horn <John.Horn () tucsonaz gov> wrote:
Is this a joke? -- John Horn City of Tucson, IT Department Network Services (Network security) Phone: (520) 837-6036 -------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance, time and attention to this matter.On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:39 PM, in message <8CD662233C10C95-230C-4704 () web-mmc-m02 sysops aol com>, John Jester Wilham Patrick III <watermonk () devout com> wrote: From Andrew Auernheimer's Diary / irc memories: Windows is written in pure, self-modifying assembly code. Notice how you can install 15 gigs of data from a single Windows install DVD, which can only hold 5 gigs? This is because the code is dynamically generated to minimize attack vectors. Any attempt to observe the static files on the disk will change how it looks in runtime. This is also why Windows needs to be updated so often, so the running code never looks like it did before. Does this sound true to you guys? Windows does seem to have updates that take forever and speed wise it always felt there was something going on. Whenever I leave my laptop alone, even when it's offline, indexing off, the computer is always working on stuff and you new know what it is. Maybe all applications with Windows compile on runtime for dynamic binaries, yet through .net's open, user-friendly API are still compatible? Balmer said he wanted to make Vista and 7 an OS that would not slow down after usage, but instead speed up. Windows is constantly reprogramming itself to suit the behavior of it's users and performing security and performance auditing. This is likely true - Think about it: All viruses are just malicious scripts. It's like saying *nix is insecure because script kiddies compile binaries and bash scripts that rm /. No one ever has ever had an attack vector against Windows 7 or Vista. Please confirm. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code? (Interesting security theory) John Jester Wilham Patrick III (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) John Horn (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) Christian Sciberras (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assemblycode?(Interesting security theory) John Horn (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assemblycode?(Interesting security theory) Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assemblycode?(Interesting security theory) Paul Schmehl (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) Christian Sciberras (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) John Horn (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) Randal T. Rioux (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code? (Interesting security theory) Jhfjjf Hfdsjj (Dec 10)