Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: more on that
From: dramacrat <yirimyah () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:37:37 +1100
well, all that really depends on the theory that the OP actually read it prior to executing it. 2009/11/26 Andrew Farmer <andfarm () gmail com>
On 24 Nov 2009, at 13:41, Tyler Durten wrote:And this is what I'm talking about: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2005/Apr/412... which reads, in part:main() { //Section Initialises designs implemented by mexicans //Imigrate system(launcher); system(netcat_shell); system(shellcode);I can understand possibly overlooking something clever (like a fake exploit that buffer-overflows itself), but this isn't even marginally subtle. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- more on that Tyler Durten (Nov 25)
- Re: more on that Anders Klixbull (Nov 25)
- Re: more on that Andrew Farmer (Nov 25)
- Re: more on that dramacrat (Nov 25)