Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
From: "Michal" <michal () sharescope co uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:23:37 -0000
Anyone from Canada/America who laughs at the English for "nanny state" needs to look at their own country...your just a bad. And, we have hundreds of channels WITH adverts, but we get the BBC advert free, Radio 1 without adverts is brill...radio adverts are WORSE then TV adverts. And you don't HAVE to pay a tv licence if you dont have a TV, so in this case, you wouldn't need to pay for it anyway as you don't watch it. If you had come from a more free country, like Sweden or something, I'd let you laugh...but you come from Canada...eff'ing hell son, look at your own country. And making a joke about English police...they talk about noise on these lists but come on...yours (and this one as well) are worse then noise -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of Byron Sonne Sent: 19 March 2009 02:47 To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
You're in Canada, right? So your TV stations have 15 minutes per hour
I don't watch TV. And I certainly wouldn't pay for a license. Even if it were commercial free. In any case, what's that dessicated old tart Lizzie gonna do if you don't pay? Send the bobbies to throw you in TV jail?
By the way, shouldn't you have to provide a copy of your email in French? It IS the nanny state after all.
No, as I'm not a federal gov't service. Six TV channels, and 7 radio stations? That's awful, but then again, it's not like there's anything worthwhile on the hundreds we get over here. Touché, good sir. -- Byron L. Sonne :: blsonne () halvdan com :: www.halvdan.com gpg: 0x69D9EAA6, C651 EF07 1298 58B3 615D 4019 E196 BAE1 69D9 EAA6 "For Good, return Good. For Evil, return Justice" _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Ivan . (Mar 15)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update James Matthews (Mar 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Matt (Mar 18)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update A . L . M . Buxey (Mar 18)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Byron Sonne (Mar 18)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Stuart Dunkeld (Mar 18)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Byron Sonne (Mar 18)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Michal (Mar 19)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Byron Sonne (Mar 19)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update James Matthews (Mar 19)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update A . L . M . Buxey (Mar 18)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Matt Olson (Mar 18)