Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame
From: opt opt <opternaut () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:52:29 -0500
The Disclosure War Continues. Dear Paul, Our individual security does not only pertain to what we control, but what other's control as well. Also, the information we use to protect our slice of the internet is disseminated by a community. So it's not really nomadic at all, as you imply. However, this is how anti-sec would like it to be. Any hacker who would advocate discretion of discovery should consider the fact they too, in this system, will miss out on possibly novel or innovative new research. This seems to oppose hacking as well as progression, and instead reveal a very immature desire to control an environment which thrives on change. Now to relieve any cramping you may have from reading a post with such serious undertones, feast your eyes on this: http://tinyurl.com/ncksbj On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Paul Schmehl<pschmehl_lists () tx rr com> wrote:
--On July 12, 2009 3:47:12 PM -0500 mod-raver () hushmail com wrote:There is not even a bit of logic out there..believe me! I suggest you to visit the anti-sec blog and read there their statements. Here something from the anti-sec blog: ''A secure Internet is an Internet without freedom, without privacy, and without anonymity.....Sadly, the political systems of the first world have been perverted by an evil which ensures that none who do not share its nature hold office.'' They want the total internet anarchy and personally i believe these guys they lost it.The internet isn't something you secure. You secure that which you can control. You leave the rest up to others who have control over their part. And you block or blacklist those you choose not to connect to because of their lack of security. So the anti-sec bozos are free to be as insecure as they want to be and to exercise their freedom, privacy and anonymity in their world. Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ****************************************** WARNING: Check the headers before replying _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- AntiAntiSec / Endgame AntiAnti Sec (Jul 10)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame T Biehn (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame opt opt (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame Cance Consulting (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame Dean Pierce (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame opt opt (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame T Biehn (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame mod-raver (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame Paul Schmehl (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame opt opt (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame Paul Schmehl (Jul 12)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame darkp (Jul 13)
- Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame Tamber Krain (Jul 13)