Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Why FD should unban n3td3v.
From: "John Q Publix" <johnqpublicr () hush com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:56:54 +0000
Some of you may call n3td3v annoying, others may call him funny, but others may genuinely value his comments on the list. Leave it up to the reader to decide. FD exists to be unmoderated and uncensored. This list is a great thing, and I'm requesting that it be restored to it's former glory. While I'm no fan of n3td3v, censoring him sets a dangerous precedent. If I wanted to filter out his mails client-side, I still could btw. Just don't censor him on the server. Just my 2 cents. john q public _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Why FD should unban n3td3v. John Q Publix (Aug 30)
- Re: Why FD should unban n3td3v. Lane Christiansen (Aug 30)
- Re: Why FD should unban n3td3v. Anders Klixbull (Aug 31)
- Re: Why FD should unban n3td3v. vulcanius (Aug 31)
- Re: Why FD should unban n3td3v. Lane Christiansen (Aug 30)