Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Mr. Magorium's Wunderbar Emporium


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 02:43:10 -0400

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:07:53 -0000, security curmudgeon said:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
: Of course, getting a CVE for that issue would have forced disclosure of 
: the bug too, quite possibly before the vendors were ready to ship 

Huh? Apparently you don't know how CVE assignment works.

If you request one from CVE, they can assign one without knowing any 
details of the vulnerability. CVE will embargo the details until the 
researcher and/or vendor are ready. I assume the Candidate Numbering 
Authorities would be able to do the same, but going to Red Hat, Debian or 
Ubuntu in this case may not be the best option.

Yes, but to make the CVE actually *useful*, they need to eventually release
it.  Sure, I may have 5 or 10 CAN in my pocket - and I can even wave around
CAN-2009-3439 and say 'Death of Internet Predicted'.  But for the CAN/CVE
to be *useful*, it needs to be disclosed.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: