Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: security industry software license
From: M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:47:10 -0300
Any OSI-based set, but without enforcing security-through-obscurity concepts. Maybe adapting some Bell-LaPadula ideas. There are lots of models to discuss about. The real question however is: can we start fresh? On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <gtb () slac stanford edu> wrote:
* writing a whole new set of protocols to be used over a whole new independent backbone infrastructure; andI suggest the OSI protocol stack, for the security-through-obscurity benefits. ASN.1, anybody? :)GOSIP anyone? I think the DMS was claimed to be more secure since it was based on OSI.
-- Marcio Barbado, Jr. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: security industry software license, (continued)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 14)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 14)
- Re: security industry software license Michael Simpson (Oct 14)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 14)
- Re: security industry software license Ureleet (Oct 21)
- Re: security industry software license Freeman Y. (Oct 12)
- Re: security industry software license Garrett M. Groff (Oct 14)
- Re: security industry software license Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 13)
- Re: security industry software license Buhrmaster, Gary (Oct 13)
- Re: security industry software license M . B . Jr . (Oct 13)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license Glenn.Everhart (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license Razi Shaban (Oct 18)