Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Free Iraq
From: M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:56:30 -0300
Throwaway1, there is absolutely no sense in evoking 1990's UN-authorized action to justify 2003's UN's-Security-Council-unauthorized-and-illegal invasion. Your childish reasoning is no more than a poor attempt of sophistic argumentation. Yours sincerely, On 3/26/08, Throwaway1 () columbus rr com <Throwaway1 () columbus rr com> wrote:
=========================================================================== On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:55 PM, net-dummy wrote: > >Iraq is an invaded country, and America has no right to be there at all. > Actually, dummy... The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August of 1990 led to a United Nations authorization to remove Saddam's forces from Kuwait. This military action was carried mainly by the Americans for entirely practical reasons. The United Nations halted hostilities and declared that a ceasefire would be in effect as long as Saddam cooperated fully with United Nations Inspectors who were looking for an extensive list of banned weapons, which included but was by no means limited to; chemical, biological and nuclear/radiological weapons. After over a decade of continual failure to cooperate, the American political leadership decided that they could no longer take the same patient approach that they had taken for the previous 12 years; and resumed hostilities. After invading Iraq and removing Saddam, American forces searched for the aforementioned list of banned weapons, and while they found most of them they did not find stockpiles of weaponized biologicals, final stage chemicals or nuclear/radiologicals. Whether you believe this is because Saddam didn't possess them at the time of the invasion or that he simply did a better job of hiding them than the American's did of looking for them doesn't change the facts. Nor does your opinion of the current American administration or your opinion of their actions. However, the most disturbing part of your post was not that you demonstrated your ignorance once again... That is basically; your job here. No, the disturbing part of your asinine post was that you made Saddam's murderous Ba'athist thugs the moral equivalent of the Free Tibetan People. THAT needed to be answered, or I would have ignore this post as I ordinarily do to ALL of your posts. ============================================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you? http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-- Marcio Barbado, Jr. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Free Iraq, (continued)
- Re: Free Iraq Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq Dennis Henderson (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq Razi Shaban (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq b. (Mar 28)
- Re: Free Iraq Razi Shaban (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq news (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq davidrook (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq infolookup (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq Garrett M. Groff (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq Garrett M. Groff (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Iraq n3td3v (Mar 27)
- Free Beer Larry Seltzer (Mar 27)
- Re: Free Beer Fetch, Brandon (Mar 28)
- Re: Free Beer don bailey (Mar 28)
- Re: Free Beer jeroen (Mar 28)