Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence
From: "Nate McFeters" <nate.mcfeters () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:06:39 -0600
Stop the madness! I'm going to conduct an expirament... I'm going to send an email to the list with several stupid comments, three comments that have nothing to do with what FD was created for, and several points as to why Cross-Site Scripting is the most dangerous security vulnerability ever and see how many responses I can get. Then I'm going to respond to each of them with every email in the chain, but I won't stop there, I will repeat my original statement with slightly different linguistic differences, thereby getting myself to the top of a search engine list. See Ronnie, you jacked it all up, you should have talked about Cross-Site Scripting and made several terribly stupid points in addition to your completely irelevant email, then you would've owned all the search engines. Seriously, is there a moderator/administrator for this list? If so, is your name John like Ronnie says? If so, hello John, can we get some moderation/administration please? Every once in a blue moon there's an email I get from Full Disclosure that keeps me on the list... could we at least try to cut down on the crap in between? Thanks! On 1/15/08, Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> wrote:
Ronnie - Norfolk Design to me:All we are trying to do is neutralise false accusations that were madeaboutus by a malicious spammer which are appearing in search engines. I have personally contacted John the list administrator and have his full permission to do this. We have a signed letter from the BBC litigation department confirmingthatthe accusations are completely untrue. I really hope all members understand, and offer my sincerest apologiesforany inconvenience this is causing but it's our only option. Kindest regards Ronnie Zahdeh Norfolk Design Limits are in the mind, not on the web. E-mail: ronnie () norfolkdesign com Website: http://www.norfolkdesign.com The information contained in this email is sent from Norfolk Design andisintended to the addressed recipient(s) only. The content is confidentialand <<snip>> I (loosely) understand your grievance. I disagree with your choice of methods to "correct" it. Sending the same message to this list at least three times, and now largely repeating that message but not in the pseudo-legalistic mumbo- jumbo some cheap lawyer scribbled on the back of an envelope in the bar the night before last does not help make you look like a victim. Pairing it with a totally nonsensical pseudo-legalistic "disclaimer", probably programmatically attached to all Email sent out from your company Email server beyond your control, just make you look even sillier. _That_ is what I was pointing out. I don't give a rat's arse about your perceived slandering or even the (initial) steps you've taken to "correct" it (as, it seems, you see this farce). I start to care when you needlessly repeat yourself _especially_ when you couple all that with your nonsensical, legally meaningless and uneforceable, "disclaimers" Rather than wasting your and our time trying to further justify your increasing nonsense, go spend a few quid on a _competent_ IT lawyer and ask him why folk are making fun of your Email "disclaimers"... (I suspect you'll have trouble deciding if any given lawyer you choose to consult about this is "competent" to provide such advice, but as a rough rule of thumb, if they don't suggest drastic changes to (generally, blanket removal of) your current "disclaimer", their opinion is not worth paying for.) Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence, (continued)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Ronnie - Norfolk Design (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Ronnie - Norfolk Design (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Alan J. Wylie (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Fredrick Diggle (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence worried security (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Ronnie - Norfolk Design (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Nick FitzGerald (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Ronnie - Norfolk Design (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Nick FitzGerald (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Nate McFeters (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Nate McFeters (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence scott (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence worried security (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Nate McFeters (Jan 15)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Robert Allinson (Jan 16)
- Re: NorfolkDesign.com proven track of excellence Nick FitzGerald (Jan 15)