Re: More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored

[n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>]

You're like a shite that won't flush away.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com> wrote:
> all speculation:
>
> no 1 knows 4 sure.
>
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss
>
> http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/
>
> http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm
>
> c how i did that n3td3v?  i posted links, nd talked about the article
> w/out stealing ppls work.
>
> pay attention.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight () gmail com> wrote:
> > 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com>
> > > u arent getting it.
> > >
> > > it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors.  they r talking about actual
> > > backdoors in the code.  so that anyone who knows the backdoor can
> > > acess any windows system regarless.  they r saying that microsoft has
> > > coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any
> > > system, patched or not.  pay attention.
> >
> > I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored
> > here.  The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms
> > could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files
> > available through P2P to full remote system access.
> >
> > Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other
> > than this statement?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/