Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: FD culture!?
From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 05:38:00 +0000
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam () gmail com> wrote:
On 12/7/08, j-f sentier <j.sentiar () gmail com> wrote:Pwoouwawa ... n3td3v you do really suck. you need to create fake users as ghost, mike.c, andrew wallace, to prove some point ? you're useless dude, no one like you, get the fuck out of here.People with multiple personalities! Split personality problem? Or is all this all an intentional activity and looks like (in practice) the owners of FD are ok with where FD is heading to! How can someone act ignorant for so long? Yelling, "this is the drawback of a unmoderated mailing list" isnt the answer nor the solution. We joined FD because we thought umoderated doesnt mean untamed and definitely... having to tolerate so much of noise and nonsense for so long. We all know all these has a easy fix. Its really time for the owners of the list to send a clear message. Whats going on? How do you see all this? Whats your prospective? Where is FD heading? We all really want to have a CLEAR answer in words/action. I am really willing to hear about all this from the prospective of Mr. John Cartwright or the answer to just 1 question. So Mr John, how does all of this fit into the scope of FD-character, http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html thanks, -bipin
What's John Cartwright got to do with an unmoderated mailing list? You joined F-D because you thought it would be partially moderated when someone *you~* don't agree with annoys you? lolcopter. You know where the unsubscribe button is if you don't like this style of mailing list management, please use it instead of moaning. On a side note, I already asked for Ureleet to be banned, but Cartwright's not interested in partially moderating an unmoderated mailing list. Would you rather the list was partially moderated? You would never be sure if something you liked was getting through or not, thats what makes people paranoid about Bugtraq, you don't know what's getting held back and who might actually find the stuff that doesn't get through interesting. Also, with Bugtraq there is a paranoia that stuff isn't posted to it as fast as it should because of a business decision at Symantec instead of fully informing people what's been submitted. I mean Bugtraq should have another mailing list for the stuff that didn't get accepted on Bugtraq, maybe call it Trashtraq, then people could still read the rejected stuff that was submitted to Bugtraq incase someone found it useful. Other people think Bugtraq isn't the solution and that Full-Disclosure is the solution, but the choice is upto you, you choose Full-Disclosure or you choose Bugtraq, the options are available to you, and perhaps, just perhaps Full-Disclosure isn't for you and you should unsubscribe. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- FD culture!? Bipin Gautam (Dec 05)
- Re: FD culture!? n3td3v (Dec 06)
- Re: FD culture!? Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure (Dec 06)
- Re: FD culture!? ghost (Dec 06)
- Message not available
- Fwd: FD culture!? j-f sentier (Dec 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? j-f sentier (Dec 06)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Bipin Gautam (Dec 06)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? n3td3v (Dec 06)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Bipin Gautam (Dec 06)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? n3td3v (Dec 06)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? vulcanius (Dec 07)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Bipin Gautam (Dec 07)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? n3td3v (Dec 07)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? j-f sentier (Dec 07)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Bipin Gautam (Dec 07)
- Re: FD culture!? Drogo Bumbleroot (Dec 07)
- Re: FD culture!? n3td3v (Dec 07)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? n3td3v (Dec 07)
- Re: FD culture!? n3td3v (Dec 06)