Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FD culture!?
From: "Stack Smasher" <stacksmasher () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:30:19 -0500
Are you fucking retarded? The filtering of this information in any way would be a crime against humanity. On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam () gmail com> wrote:
Guys, This mailing list lives up to its name "Full Disclosure" for tolerating the monkeys and their chattering in this list for quite some time now without moderation or any action! This mailing list had a "culture", "the audience base" and that was the "only reason" we all subscribed to it! # Standard, culture, content quality, popular interest, intellect... spam!, off topic discussion, unnecessary topic, flame warFrom the above list ask anyone "sensible" enough to pick up qualitiesto be a information security mailing list. What options do you come up with? If someone repeatedly meet to fail the general code of conduct please band them for not being in "popular interest" for an unmoderated discussion. Is it that hard so hard to grasp that those type of people really dont deserve here? A wise person would never choose to speak in-between fools. It looks like FD is starting to be plagued with similar trend and slowly dropping on the quality of discussion/interest. If FD moderators cant maintain the mailing list culture, its quality its market reputation and audience interest naturally decreases as it has been. FD should be a platform to promote collective intelligence in information security with MEANINGFUL full-disclosure instead of having never ending noise, annoyance, distraction and meaning less discussion to waste our time. FD was there because not all info-sec mailing list provided unmoderated discussion. But moderators please assure a minimum level of "content/quality". In the list we all are obligated to keep harmony with all but least not with people with problem to socialize and generally annoyance. Moderators are really not doing justice by going against the "popular belief" (the subscribers) Please do not forget, the mailing list is there because WE subscribers are there and we were subscribed to this list because this mailing list had a culture! "Full-Disclosure" live up to its name but please preserve a standard, a culture and a quality of discussion. Phase 2: - Post unnecessarily and very frequently like the current FD trend. - Ask other 30 people to do the same. - Make sure any/all meaningful discussion is dwarfed in unnecessary and meaningless noise. - Wait moderators to act... lobby........ or repeat phase 2 till FD goes in dust, really! Shame on FD moderators for putting us on a situation to neither we can unsubscribe from the list for the real content that pops here now and then... but have to tolerate unproductive noise lots of time from people with anonymous identities for top-posting on off-track discussion. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-- "If you see me laughing, you better have backups"
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!?, (continued)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Ureleet (Dec 08)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Knud Erik Højgaard (Dec 08)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Ureleet (Dec 09)
- Re: Fwd: FD culture!? Ureleet (Dec 07)
- Solaris 10 Auditing KT (Dec 08)
- Re: Solaris 10 Auditing Jarmon, Don R (Dec 08)
- Re: Solaris 10 Auditing Michael Holstein (Dec 08)
- Re: Solaris 10 Auditing James Matthews (Dec 08)
- Re: FD culture!? Ureleet (Dec 07)
- Re: FD culture!? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 07)
- Re: FD culture!? James Matthews (Dec 06)
- Re: FD culture!? Night Ninja (Dec 06)