Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: defining 0day
From: gjgowey () tmo blackberry net
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:50:06 +0000
The game king of the hill comes to mind watching this. Who will stand alone on top with all others bowing down before him? Geoff Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. -----Original Message----- From: "Throwaway1 () columbus rr com" <Throwaway1 () columbus rr com> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:04:24 To:full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day How many days has this RIDICULOUS argument been raging, apparently without ANYBODY here mentioning the Medical background of Zero Day? Patient Zero? Any of this ringing a bell? Not that it matters. The other thing I have yet to see is an explanation of why this particular bout of mental masturbation matters. Not that I'm expecting to... -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: defining 0day Throwaway1 () columbus rr com (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day gjgowey (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day scott (Sep 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: defining 0day full-disclosure (Sep 26)
- Re: defining 0day full-disclosure (Sep 26)
- Re: defining 0day Awful Disclosure (Sep 29)
- Re: defining 0day Jimby Sharp (Sep 29)
- Re: defining 0day gjgowey (Sep 25)