Re: defining 0day

["Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>]

On 9/25/07, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:

> Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able
> to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.
>
> What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of
> previous definitions?


Seems to me that definitions, and language itself, is a product of
evolution. You can't just remove all previous meanings. Its better
anyway to stick to the most accepted, acknowledged and DOCUMENTED
definitions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0day

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/zero%20day

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=what+is+0day&gwp=13

Even better:
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:DERnyW4MM4wJ:nujia.norwich.edu/current/2_2_art01.pdf+origins+of+zero+day+definition&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us&client=firefox-a
or
http://nujia.norwich.edu/current/2_2_art01.pdf

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/