Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: URI handling woes in Acrobat Reader, Netscape, Miranda, Skype


From: "Lamer Buster" <lamerbuster () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:44:18 +0530

why don't you guys agree to disagree and STUF?

On 10/8/07, Geo. <geoincidents () nls net> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glynn Clements" <glynn () gclements plus com>

URIs which it passes to an external handler (e.g. mailto:), it only
needs to identify the scheme (to select the correct handler); it is
the handler's responsibility to validate its own URIs (i.e. mail
programs need to validate mailto: URIs).

I don't agree. Whatever program takes input from an untrusted source, it's
that programs duty to sanitize the input before passing it on to internal
components. It's like a firewall, you filter before it gets inside the
system.

Example, an ftp server has to sanitize filenames to prevent useage of
streams on NTFS, you don't blame the filesystem that the input gets passed
to, it's the job of the ftp server to do the sanitizing of untrusted input.

Geo.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: