Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () dione ids pl>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:11:49 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Alessandro Dellavedova wrote:
am I wrong or the mechanism that you implement is similar to the one implemented in lft (Layer Four Traceroute http://pwhois.org/lft/ ) ?
No, what you describe is similar to tcptraceroute, from what I understand (they use stray SYNs or RSTs or other TCP packets to do a regular traceroute). /mz _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- 0trace - traceroute on established connections Michal Zalewski (Jan 06)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Michal Zalewski (Jan 06)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Matthew Flaschen (Jan 08)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Brendan Dolan-Gavitt (Jan 08)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Alessandro Dellavedova (Jan 09)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Jon Oberheide (Jan 09)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Michal Zalewski (Jan 09)
- Re: [DCC SPAM] 0trace - traceroute on established connections Lance James (Jan 09)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Robert Święcki (Jan 13)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections 3APA3A (Jan 14)
- Re: 0trace - traceroute on established connections Jon Oberheide (Jan 24)